NIMH Data Archive - Data

Genomics

Neuroimaging

Phenotype¹

New Trial
Clinical Trial

¹ Numbers reported are subjects by age

New Project
Grant/Project Number

Format should be in the following format: Activity Code, Institute Abbreviation, and Serial Number. Grant Type, Support Year, and Suffix should be excluded. For example, grant 1R01MH123456-01A1 should be entered R01MH123456

Collection - Use Existing Experiment

To associate an experiment to the current collection, just select an axperiment from the table below then click the associate experiment button to persist your changes (saving the collection is not required). Note that once an experiment has been associated to two or more collections, the experiment will not longer be editable.

The table search feature is case insensitive and targets the experiment id, experiment name and experiment type columns. The experiment id is searched only when the search term entered is a number, and filtered using a startsWith comparison. When the search term is not numeric the experiment name is used to filter the results.

Select	Experiment Id	Experiment Name	Experiment Type	Created On

24	HI-NGS_R1	Omics	02/16/2011
475	MB1-10 (CHOP)	Omics	06/07/2016
490	Illumina Infinium PsychArray BeadChip Assay	Omics	07/07/2016
501	PharmacoBOLD Resting State	fMRI	07/27/2016
506	PVPREF	Omics	08/05/2016
509	ABC-CT Resting v2	EEG	08/18/2016
13	Comparison of FI expression in Autistic and Neurotypical Homo Sapiens	Omics	12/28/2010
18	AGRE/Broad Affymetrix 5.0 Genotype Experiment	Omics	01/06/2011
22	Stitching PCR Sequencing	Omics	02/14/2011
26	ASD_Methylation	Omics	03/01/2011
29	Microarray family 03 (father, mother, sibling)	Omics	03/24/2011
37	Standard paired-end sequencing of BCRs	Omics	04/19/2011
38	Illumina Mate-Pair BCR sequencing	Omics	04/19/2011
39	Custom Jumping Libraries	Omics	04/19/2011
40	Custom CapBP	Omics	04/19/2011
41	Immunofluorescence	Omics	05/11/2011
43	Autism brain sample genotyping, Illumina	Omics	05/16/2011
47	ARRA Autism Sequencing Collaboration at Baylor. SOLiD 4 System	Omics	08/01/2011
53	AGRE Omni1-quad	Omics	10/11/2011
59	AGP genotyping	Omics	04/03/2012
60	Ultradeep 454 sequencing of synaptic genes from postmortem cerebella of individuals with ASD and neurotypical controls	Omics	06/23/2012
63	Microemulsion PCR and Targeted Resequencing for Variant Detection in ASD	Omics	07/20/2012
76	Whole Genome Sequencing in Autism Families	Omics	01/03/2013
519	Resting	fMRI	11/08/2016
90	Genotyped IAN Samples	Omics	07/09/2013
91	NJLAGS Axiom Genotyping Array	Omics	07/16/2013
93	AGP genotyping (CNV)	Omics	09/06/2013
106	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 2	EEG	11/07/2013
107	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 3	EEG	11/07/2013
108	Longitudinal Sleep Study. AURA 200	EEG	11/07/2013
105	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 1	EEG	11/07/2013
109	Longitudinal Sleep Study. AURA 400	EEG	11/07/2013
116	Gene Expression Analysis WG-6	Omics	01/07/2014
131	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Charlie Brown and Sesame Street - Project 1	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
132	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Animacy - Project 1	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
133	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Mom Stranger - Project 2	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
134	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Face Emotion - Project 3	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
145	AGRE/FMR1_Illumina.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
146	AGRE/MECP2_Sanger.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
147	AGRE/MECP2_Junior.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
151	Candidate Gene Identification in familial Autism	Omics	06/09/2014
152	NJLAGS Whole Genome Sequencing	Omics	07/01/2014
154	Math Autism Study - Vinod Menon	fMRI	07/15/2014
155	Resting	fMRI	07/25/2014
156	Speech	fMRI	07/25/2014
159	Emotion	fMRI	07/25/2014
160	syllable contrast	EEG	07/29/2014
167	School-age naturalistic stimuli	Eye Tracking	09/19/2014
44	AGRE/Broad Affymetrix 5.0 Genotype Experiment	Omics	06/27/2011
45	Exome Sequencing of 20 Sporadic Cases of Autism Spectrum Disorder	Omics	07/15/2011

Collection - Add Experiment

Add Supporting Documentation

Funding Source:
URL:

Request Submission Exemption

Not Eligible

The Data Expected list for this Collection shows some raw data as missing. Contact the NDA Help Desk with any questions.

Please confirm that you will not be enrolling any more subjects and that all raw data has been collected and submitted.

Collection Updated

Your Collection is now in Data Analysis phase and exempt from biannual submissions. Analyzed data is still expected prior to publication or no later than the project end date.

[CMS] Error

[CMS]

Unable to change collection phase where targeted enrollment is less than 90%

You have requested to move the sharing dates for the following assessments:

Data Expected Item	Original Sharing Date	New Sharing Date

Please provide a reason for this change, which will be sent to the Program Officers listed within this collection:

Explanation must be between 20 and 200 characters in length.

Please press Save or Cancel

HCP-D Mapping the Human Connectome During Typical Development (HCP-D) #2846 Collection State:Shared

General
Experiments (4)
Shared Data
Publications (23)
Data Expected (66)
Associated Studies (12)

Collection Title	Collection Investigators	Collection Description
Collection Title:	HCP-D Mapping the Human Connectome During Typical Development (HCP-D)
Collection Investigators:	Deanna Barch, Susan Bookheimer, Randy Buckner, Mirella Dapretto, Stephen Smith, Leah Somerville, Kathleen Thomas, David Van Essen, Essa Yacoub
Collection Description:	The major technological and analytical advances in human brain imaging achieved as part of the Human Connectome Projects (HCP) enable examination of structural and functional brain connectivity at unprecedented levels of spatial and temporal resolution. This information is proving crucial to our understanding of normative variation in adult brain connectivity. It is now timely to use the tools and analytical approaches developed by the HCP to understand how structural and functional wiring of the brain develops. Using state-of-the art HCP imaging approaches will allow investigators to push our currently limited understanding of normative brain development to new levels. This knowledge will critically inform prevention and intervention efforts targeting well known public health concerns (e.g., neurological and psychiatric disorders, poverty). The majority of developmental connectivity studies to date have used fairly coarse resolution, have not been multi-modal in nature, and few studies have used comparable methods to assess individuals across a sufficiently wide age range to truly capture developmental processes (e.g., early childhood through adolescence). Here we propose a consortium of five sites (Harvard, Oxford, UCLA, University of Minnesota, Washington University), with extensive complimentary expertise in brain imaging and neural development, including many of the investigators from the adult and pilot lifespan HCP efforts. Our synergistic integration of advances from the HARVARD-MGH and WU-MINN-OXFORD HCPs with cutting edge expertise in child and adolescent brain development will enable major advances in our understanding of the normative development of human brain connectivity. The resultant unique resource will provide rich, multimodal data on several biological and cognitive constructs that are of critical importance to health and well-being across this age range and allow a wide range of investigators in the community to gain new insights about brain development and connectivity. Aim 1 will be to optimize existing HCP Lifespan Pilot project protocols on the widely available Prisma platform to respect practical constraints in studying healthy children and adolescents over a wide age range and will also collect a matched set of data on the original Skyra and proposed Prisma HCP protocols to serve as a linchpin between the past and present efforts. Aim 2 will be to collect 1500 high quality neuroimaging and associated behavioral datasets on healthy children and adolescents in the age range of 5-21, using matched protocols across sites, enabling robust characterization of age-related changes in network properties including connectivity, network integrity, response properties during tasks, and behavior. Aim 3 will be to collect and analyze longitudinal subsamples, task, and phenotypic measures that constitute intensive sub-studies of inflection points of health-relevant behavioral changes within specific developmental phases. Aim 4 will capitalize on our success in sharing data in the HCP, and use established tools, platforms and procedures to make all data publically available through the Connectome Coordinating Facility (CCF).
Data Repository:	Connectome Coordination Facility
Permission Group:
Collection Creation Date:	01/29/2018
NIH Research Initiative:	Human Connectome Project (HCP)
Collection Phase:	Funding Completed
Collection Sub-Phase:	Close Out
Collection State:	Shared
Blinded Clinical Trial:	No
Total Funded Amount:	$3,423,207.00
Subjects Shared:	652

{"values":[]}

Loading Chart...

Funding Sources:

Funding Source Name	Funding Source URL
NIH - Extramural	None

Supporting Documentation:

File Name	File Type	Description	Audience
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/uploads/public/5f2/079/44e/5f207944eb205925764418.pdf	Other	Files and directory structure of Lifespan 1.0 Release HCP-Aging and HCP-Development imaging and behavioral data.	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/LS_Release_2.0_Access_Instructions.pdf	Results	Detailed instructions on applying for NDA access to Lifespan 2.0 Release HCP-Aging & HCP-Development data, selecting, and downloading data with download manager and on the command line.	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/LS2.0_Crosswalk_Behavioral_Data_Dictionary.xlsx	Results	Crosswalk .xlsx spreadsheet linking behavioral NDA structures and elements to the original HCP variable descriptions. hcp description column is current best data dictionary for variables and answer codes as of the Lifespan 2.0 Release.	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/HCD_LS_2.0_subject_completeness.csv	Results	CSV containing per subject completeness of imaging modalities, QC issue codes, behavioral data availability, and unrelated status for finding subjects of interest for analyses.	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/LS_2.0_Release_Appendix_2.pdf	Results	Lifespan 2.0 Release HCP-Aging and HCP-Development: Details and References for Behavioral & Clinical Instruments	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/LS_2.0_Release_Appendix_1.pdf	Results	File names and directory structure of Lifespan 2.0 Release HCP-Aging and HCP-Development preprocessed and unprocessed imaging data. Organized by OPTION 2 filters/HCP package names on NDA HCP Aging & Development query page.	General Public

Grant Information:

Project Number	Project Title	Start Date	End Date	Planned Enrollment	Actual Enrollment	Organization	Funds Obligated
U01MH109589-01	Mapping the Human Connectome During Typical Development	05/17/2016	04/30/2020	2688	2435	WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY	$3,423,207.00

Clinical Trials:

helpcenter.collection.general-tab

Collection - General Tab

Fields available for edit on the top portion of the page include:

Collection Title
Investigators
Collection Description
Collection Phase
Funding Source
Clinical Trials

Collection Status: The visibility status of an NDA Collection. Collection Status can be Shared or Private. Collections in Shared status are visible to all users and can be searched in the NDA Query Tool. Private Collections are not visible to NDA users. The Status of an NDA Collection only affects the visibility of information about the Collection (metadata) and does not relate to the status of the record-level research data in the NDA Collection.

Collection Phase: The current status of a research project submitting data to an NDA Collection, based on the timing of the award and/or the data that have been submitted.

Pre-Enrollment: The default entry made when the NDA Collection is created.
Enrolling: Data have been submitted to the NDA Collection or the NDA Data Expected initial submission date has been reached for at least one data structure category in the NDA Collection.
Data Analysis: Subject level data collection for the research project is completed and has been submitted to the NDA Collection. The NDA Collection owner or the NDA Help Desk may set this phase when they’ve confirmed data submission is complete and submitted subject counts match at least 90% of the target enrollment numbers in the NDA Data Expected. Data submission reminders will be turned off for the NDA Collection.
Funding Completed: The NIH grant award (or awards) associated with the NDA Collection has reached its end date. NDA Collections in Funding Completed phase are assigned a subphase to indicate the status of data submission.
- The Data Expected Subphase indicates that NDA expects more data will be submitted
- The Closeout Subphase indicates the data submission is complete.
- The Sharing Not Met Subphase indicates that data submission was not completed as expected.

Blinded Clinical Trial Status:

This status is set by a Collection Owner and indicates the research project is a double blinded clinical trial. When selected, the public view of Data Expected will show the Data Expected items and the Submission Dates, but the targeted enrollment and subjects submitted counts will not be displayed.
Targeted enrollment and subjects submitted counts are visible only to NDA Administrators and to the NDA Collection or as the NDA Collection Owner.
When an NDA Collection that is flagged Blinded Clinical Trial reaches the maximum data sharing date for that Data Repository (see https://nda.nih.gov/nda/sharing-regimen.html), the embargo on Data Expected information is released.

Funding Source

The organization(s) responsible for providing the funding is listed here.

Supporting Documentation

Users with Submission privileges, as well as Collection Owners, Program Officers, and those with Administrator privileges, may upload and attach supporting documentation. By default, supporting documentation is shared to the general public, however, the option is also available to limit this information to qualified researchers only.

Grant Information

Identifiable details are displayed about the Project of which the Collection was derived from. You may click in the Project Number to view a full report of the Project captured by the NIH.

Clinical Trials

Any data that is collected to support or further the research of clinical studies will be available here. Collection Owners and those with Administrator privileges may add new clinical trials.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) determine which Permission Group data are submitted into?

During Collection creation, NDA staff determine the appropriate Permission Group based on the type of data to be submitted, the type of access that will be available to data access users, and the information provided by the Program Officer during grant award.
How do I know when a NDA Collection has been created?

When a Collection is created by NDA staff and marked as Shared, an email notification will automatically be sent to the PI(s) of the grant(s) associated with the Collection to notify them.
Is a single grant number ever associated with more than one Collection?

The NDA system does not allow for a single grant to be associated with more than one Collection; therefore, a single grant will not be listed in the Grant Information section of a Collection for more than one Collection.
Why is there sometimes more than one grant included in a Collection?

In general, each Collection is associated with only one grant; however, multiple grants may be associated if the grant has multiple competing segments for the same grant number or if multiple different grants are all working on the same project and it makes sense to hold the data in one Collection (e.g., Cooperative Agreements).

Glossary

Administrator Privilege

A privilege provided to a user associated with an NDA Collection or NDA Study whereby that user can perform a full range of actions including providing privileges to other users.
Collection Owner

Generally, the Collection Owner is the contact PI listed on a grant. Only one NDA user is listed as the Collection owner. Most automated emails are primarily sent to the Collection Owner.
Collection Phase
The Collection Phase provides information on data submission as opposed to grant/project completion so while the Collection phase and grant/project phase may be closely related they are often different. Collection users with Administrative Privileges are encouraged to edit the Collection Phase. The Program Officer as listed in eRA (for NIH funded grants) may also edit this field. Changes must be saved by clicking the Save button at the bottom of the page. This field is sortable alphabetically in ascending or descending order. Collection Phase options include:
- Pre-Enrollment: A grant/project has started, but has not yet enrolled subjects.
- Enrolling: A grant/project has begun enrolling subjects. Data submission is likely ongoing at this point.
- Data Analysis: A grant/project has completed enrolling subjects and has completed all data submissions.
- Funding Completed: A grant/project has reached the project end date.
Collection State

The Collection State indicates whether the Collection is viewable and searchable. Collections can be either Private, Shared, or an Ongoing Study. A Collection that is shared does not necessarily have shared data as the Collection State and state of data are independent of each other. This field can be edited by Collection users with Administrative Privileges and the Program Officer as listed in eRA (for NIH funded grants). Changes must be saved by clicking the Save button at the bottom of the page.
Collection Title

An editable field with the title of the Collection, which is often the title of the grant associated with the Collection.
Grant

Provides the grant number(s) for the grant(s) associated with the Collection. The field is a hyperlink so clicking on the Grant number will direct the user to the grant information in the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) page.
Supporting Documentation

Various documents and materials to enable efficient use of the data by investigators unfamiliar with the project and may include the research protocol, questionnaires, and study manuals.
NIH Research Initiative

NDA Collections may be organized by scientific similarity into NIH Research Initiatives, to facilitate query tool user experience. NIH Research Initiatives map to one or multiple Funding Opportunity Announcements.
Permission Group

Access to shared record-level data in NDA is provisioned at the level of a Permission Group. NDA Permission Groups consist of one or multiple NDA Collections that contain data with the same subject consents.
Planned Enrollment

Number of human subject participants to be enrolled in an NIH-funded clinical research study. The data is provided in competing applications and annual progress reports.
Actual Enrollment

Number of human subjects enrolled in an NIH-funded clinical research study. The data is provided in annual progress reports.
NDA Collection

A virtual container and organization structure for data and associated documentation from one grant or one large project/consortium. It contains tools for tracking data submission and allows investigators to define a wide array of other elements that provide context for the data, including all general information regarding the data and source project, experimental parameters used to collect any event-based data contained in the Collection, methods, and other supporting documentation. They also allow investigators to link underlying data to an NDA Study, defining populations and subpopulations specific to research aims.
Data Use Limitations

Data Use Limitations (DULs) describe the appropriate secondary use of a dataset and are based on the original informed consent of a research participant. NDA only accepts consent-based data use limitations defined by the NIH Office of Science Policy.
Total Subjects Shared

The total number of unique subjects for whom data have been shared and are available for users with permission to access data.

Contact NDA Help Desk

ID	Name	Created Date	Status	Type
1210	CARIT (Reward History Go/Nogo) Task	02/12/2019	Approved	fMRI
1212	Guessing Task	02/20/2019	Approved	fMRI
1213	Emotion Task	02/20/2019	Approved	fMRI
1214	Resting State	02/20/2019	Approved	fMRI

helpcenter.collection.experiments-tab

Collection - Experiments

The number of Experiments included is displayed in parentheses next to the tab name. You may download all experiments associated with the Collection via the Download button. You may view individual experiments by clicking the Experiment Name and add them to the Filter Cart via the Add to Cart button.

Collection Owners, Program Officers, and users with Submission or Administrative Privileges for the Collection may create or edit an Experiment.

Please note: The creation of an NDA Experiment does not necessarily mean that data collected, according to the defined Experiment, has been submitted or shared.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an Experiment be associated with more than one Collection?
Yes -see the “Copy” button in the bottom left when viewing an experiment. There are two actions that can be performed via this button:
1. Copy the experiment with intent for modifications.
2. Associate the experiment to the collection. No modifications can be made to the experiment.

Glossary

Experiment Status

An Experiment must be Approved before data using the associated Experiment_ID may be uploaded.
Experiment ID

The ID number automatically generated by NDA which must be included in the appropriate file when uploading data to link the Experiment Definition to the subject record.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Shared Data

Data structures with the number of subjects submitted and shared are provided.

Shared Data:

Title	Type	Number of Subjects
Adult Self Report	Clinical Assessments	151
Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale	Clinical Assessments	651
Blood Sample Collection	Clinical Assessments	652
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 1-5	Clinical Assessments	2
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) 6-18	Clinical Assessments	498
Children's Behavior Questionnaire Parent	Clinical Assessments	55
Clinical Medical History	Clinical Assessments	652
Cognition Composite Scores	Clinical Assessments	471
Delay Discounting Task	Clinical Assessments	641
Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (DCCS)	Clinical Assessments	472
Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	500
Edinburgh Handedness Inventory	Clinical Assessments	652
Family Environment Scale	Clinical Assessments	652
Flanker Task	Clinical Assessments	471
General Behavior Inventory	Clinical Assessments	651
Image	Imaging	652
Imaging Collection	Imaging	652
Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	652
Maternal and Birth History	Clinical Assessments	500
Medications and Treatments Form	Clinical Assessments	652
Mini Mental State Exam	Clinical Assessments	340
Munich ChronoType Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	479
NEO-Five Factor Inventory	Clinical Assessments	229
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Emotional Support Survey	Clinical Assessments	464
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Empathic Behavior Survey	Clinical Assessments	159
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Fear Surveys	Clinical Assessments	362
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Friendship Survey	Clinical Assessments	464
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Peer Rejection and Perceived Rejection Surveys	Clinical Assessments	482
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Perceived Hostility Surveys	Clinical Assessments	464
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Psychological Well-Being	Clinical Assessments	483
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Sadness Surveys	Clinical Assessments	159
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Self-Efficacy Survey	Clinical Assessments	473
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Social Withdrawal and Positive Peer Interaction Surveys	Clinical Assessments	159
NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test	Clinical Assessments	472
NIH Toolbox Motor Domain	Clinical Assessments	472
NIH Toolbox Oral Reading Recognition Test	Clinical Assessments	472
NIH Toolbox Picture Vocabulary Test	Clinical Assessments	471
NIH Toolbox Sensation Domain	Clinical Assessments	473
PROMIS Anger	Clinical Assessments	483
PROMIS Emotional Distress - Depression	Clinical Assessments	120
PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety	Clinical Assessments	120
PROMIS General Life Satisfaction	Clinical Assessments	458
PROMIS Social Isolation	Clinical Assessments	464
Pattern Comparison Processing Speed	Clinical Assessments	472
Penn Emotion Recognition Task	Clinical Assessments	629
Perceived Stress Scale	Clinical Assessments	436
PhenX Substance Use	Clinical Assessments	629
Picture Sequence Memory	Clinical Assessments	473
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index	Clinical Assessments	151
Processed MRI Data	Imaging	652
Pubertal Development Scale	Clinical Assessments	652
Research Subject	Clinical Assessments	652
Scanner Debriefing Interview	Clinical Assessments	637
Screen Time Survey	Clinical Assessments	651
Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	243
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)	Clinical Assessments	651
Sociodemographics	Clinical Assessments	652
Sports and Activities Involvement Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	500
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	243
UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale	Clinical Assessments	651
Vision Tests	Clinical Assessments	652
Vital Signs	Clinical Assessments	652
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition [part 1]	Clinical Assessments	180
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children V	Clinical Assessments	462
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence IV Edition	Clinical Assessments	2
Youth Self Report	Clinical Assessments	334

helpcenter.collection.shared-data-tab

Collection - Shared Data

This tab provides a quick overview of the Data Structure title, Data Type, and Number of Subjects that are currently Shared for the Collection. The information presented in this tab is automatically generated by NDA and cannot be edited. If no information is visible on this tab, this would indicate the Collection does not have shared data or the data is private.

The shared data is available to other researchers who have permission to access data in the Collection's designated Permission Group(s). Use the Download button to get all shared data from the Collection to the Filter Cart.

Frequently Asked Questions

How will I know if another researcher uses data that I shared through the NIMH Data Archive (NDA)?

To see what data your project have submitted are being used by a study, simply go the Associated Studies tab of your collection. Alternatively, you may review an NDA Study Attribution Report available on the General tab.
Can I get a supplement to share data from a completed research project?

Often it becomes more difficult to organize and format data electronically after the project has been completed and the information needed to create a GUID may not be available; however, you may still contact a program staff member at the appropriate funding institution for more information.
Can I get a supplement to share data from a research project that is still ongoing?

Unlike completed projects where researchers may not have the information needed to create a GUID and/or where the effort needed to organize and format data becomes prohibitive, ongoing projects have more of an opportunity to overcome these challenges. Please contact a program staff member at the appropriate funding institution for more information.

Glossary

Data Structure

A defined organization and group of Data Elements to represent an electronic definition of a measure, assessment, questionnaire, or collection of data points. Data structures that have been defined in the NDA Data Dictionary are available at https://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=data-structure
Data Type

A grouping of data by similar characteristics such as Clinical Assessments, Omics, or Neurosignal data.
Shared

The term 'Shared' generally means available to others; however, there are some slightly different meanings based on what is Shared. A Shared NDA Collection or NDA Study is viewable and searchable publicly regardless of the user's role or whether the user has an NDA account. A Shared Collection or NDA Study does not necessarily mean that data submitted to the Collection or used in the NDA Study have been shared as this is independently determined. Data are shared according the schedule defined in a Collection's Data Expected Tab and/or in accordance with data sharing expectations in the NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Additionally, Supporting Documentation uploaded to a Collection may be shared independent of whether data are shared, but will only be viewable and accessible if the Collection is Shared.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Publications

Publications relevant to NDA data are listed below. Most displayed publications have been associated with the grant within Pubmed. Use the "+ New Publication" button to add new publications. Publications relevant/not relevant to data expected are categorized. Relevant publications are then linked to the underlying data by selecting the Create Study link. Study provides the ability to define cohorts, assign subjects, define outcome measures and lists the study type, data analysis and results. Analyzed data and results are expected in this way.

PubMed ID	Study	Title	Journal	Authors	Date	Status
36346213	Create Study	Benchmarking the generalizability of brain age models: Challenges posed by scanner variance and prediction bias.	Human brain mapping	Jirsaraie, Robert J; Kaufmann, Tobias; Bashyam, Vishnu; Erus, Guray; Luby, Joan L; Westlye, Lars T; Davatzikos, Christos; Barch, Deanna M; Sotiras, Aristeidis	February 15, 2023	Not Determined
35944340	Create Study	Developmental trajectories of cortical thickness by functional brain network: The roles of pubertal timing and socioeconomic status.	Developmental cognitive neuroscience	Sanders, Ashley F P; Baum, Graham L; Harms, Michael P; Kandala, Sridhar; Bookheimer, Susan Y; Dapretto, Mirella; Somerville, Leah H; Thomas, Kathleen M; Van Essen, David C; Yacoub, Essa; Barch, Deanna M	August 5, 2022	Not Determined
35705486	Create Study	Graded Variation in T1w/T2w Ratio during Adolescence: Measurement, Caveats, and Implications for Development of Cortical Myelin.	The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience	Baum, Graham L; Flournoy, John C; Glasser, Matthew F; Harms, Michael P; Mair, Patrick; Sanders, Ashley F P; Barch, Deanna M; Buckner, Randy L; Bookheimer, Susan; Dapretto, Mirella; Smith, Stephen; Thomas, Kathleen M; Yacoub, Essa; Van Essen, David C; Somerville, Leah H	July 20, 2022	Not Determined
35697132	Create Study	Empirical transmit field bias correction of T1w/T2w myelin maps.	NeuroImage	Glasser, Matthew F; Coalson, Timothy S; Harms, Michael P; Xu, Junqian; Baum, Graham L; Autio, Joonas A; Auerbach, Edward J; Greve, Douglas N; Yacoub, Essa; Van Essen, David C; Bock, Nicholas A; Hayashi, Takuya	September 1, 2022	Not Determined
35429627	Create Study	Psychological resilience and neurodegenerative risk: A connectomics-transcriptomics investigation in healthy adolescent and middle-aged females.	NeuroImage	Petrican, Raluca; Fornito, Alex; Jones, Natalie	July 15, 2022	Not Determined
35201792	Create Study	Shifting qualities of negative affective experience through adolescence: Age-related change and associations with functional outcomes.	Emotion (Washington, D.C.)	Grisanzio, Katherine A; Flournoy, John C; Mair, Patrick; Somerville, Leah H	February 1, 2023	Not Determined
35067249	Create Study	Neural signatures of data-driven psychopathology dimensions at the transition to adolescence.	European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists	Modabbernia, Amirhossein; Michelini, Giorgia; Reichenberg, Abraham; Kotov, Roman; Barch, Deanna; Frangou, Sophia	January 24, 2022	Not Determined
35033950	Create Study	Associations between cognition and polygenic liability to substance involvement in middle childhood: Results from the ABCD study.	Drug and alcohol dependence	Paul, Sarah E; Hatoum, Alexander S; Barch, Deanna M; Thompson, Wesley K; Agrawal, Arpana; Bogdan, Ryan; Johnson, Emma C	March 1, 2022	Not Determined
34508893	Create Study	The Human Connectome Project: A retrospective.	NeuroImage	Elam, Jennifer Stine; Glasser, Matthew F; Harms, Michael P; Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N; Andersson, Jesper L R; Burgess, Gregory C; Curtiss, Sandra W; Oostenveld, Robert; Larson-Prior, Linda J; Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs; Hodge, Michael R; Cler, Eileen A; Marcus, Daniel M; Barch, Deanna M; Yacoub, Essa; Smith, Stephen M; Ugurbil, Kamil; Van Essen, David C	December 1, 2021	Not Determined
34450262	Create Study	Hierarchical modelling of functional brain networks in population and individuals from big fMRI data.	NeuroImage	Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan; Bijsterbosch, Janine D; Gong, Weikang; Jbabdi, Saad; Smith, Stephen M; Harrison, Samuel J; Woolrich, Mark W	November 1, 2021	Not Determined
33683660	Create Study	Amygdala Activation in Cognitive Task fMRI Varies with Individual Differences in Cognitive Traits.	Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience	West, Haley V; Burgess, Gregory C; Dust, Joseph; Kandala, Sridhar; Barch, Deanna M	February 1, 2021	Not Determined
33524575	Create Study	Characterizing cerebral hemodynamics across the adult lifespan with arterial spin labeling MRI data from the Human Connectome Project-Aging.	NeuroImage	Juttukonda, Meher R; Li, Binyin; Almaktoum, Randa; Stephens, Kimberly A; Yochim, Kathryn M; Yacoub, Essa; Buckner, Randy L; Salat, David H	April 15, 2021	Not Determined
32965490	Create Study	Associations Between Prenatal Cannabis Exposure and Childhood Outcomes: Results From the ABCD Study.	JAMA psychiatry	Paul, Sarah E; Hatoum, Alexander S; Fine, Jeremy D; Johnson, Emma C; Hansen, Isabella; Karcher, Nicole R; Moreau, Allison L; Bondy, Erin; Qu, Yueyue; Carter, Ebony B; Rogers, Cynthia E; Agrawal, Arpana; Barch, Deanna M; Bogdan, Ryan	January 1, 2021	Not Determined
32866666	Create Study	The developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) automated resting-state functional processing framework for newborn infants.	NeuroImage	Fitzgibbon, Sean P; Harrison, Samuel J; Jenkinson, Mark; Baxter, Luke; Robinson, Emma C; Bastiani, Matteo; Bozek, Jelena; Karolis, Vyacheslav; Cordero Grande, Lucilio; Price, Anthony N; Hughes, Emer; Makropoulos, Antonios; Passerat-Palmbach, Jonathan; Schuh, Andreas; Gao, Jianliang; Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan; O'Muircheartaigh, Jonathan; Ciarrusta, Judit; O'Keeffe, Camilla; Brandon, Jakki; Arichi, Tomoki; Rueckert, Daniel; Hajnal, Joseph V; Edwards, A David; Smith, Stephen M; Duff, Eugene; Andersson, Jesper	December 1, 2020	Not Determined
32702486	Create Study	Cortical surface registration using unsupervised learning.	NeuroImage	Cheng, Jieyu; Dalca, Adrian V; Fischl, Bruce; Zöllei, Lilla; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative	November 1, 2020	Not Determined
32497785	Create Study	A Symmetric Prior for the Regularisation of Elastic Deformations: Improved anatomical plausibility in nonlinear image registration.	NeuroImage	Lange, Frederik J; Ashburner, John; Smith, Stephen M; Andersson, Jesper L R	October 1, 2020	Not Determined
31215864	Create Study	A connectional hub in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex links areas of emotion and cognitive control.	eLife	Tang, Wei; Jbabdi, Saad; Zhu, Ziyi; Cottaar, Michiel; Grisot, Giorgia; Lehman, Julia F; Yendiki, Anastasia; Haber, Suzanne N	June 19, 2019	Not Determined
30916716	Create Study	Association of Prenatal Cannabis Exposure With Psychosis Proneness Among Children in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.	JAMA psychiatry	Fine, Jeremy D; Moreau, Allison L; Karcher, Nicole R; Agrawal, Arpana; Rogers, Cynthia E; Barch, Deanna M; Bogdan, Ryan	July 1, 2019	Not Determined
30261308	Create Study	Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: Imaging protocols for the Lifespan Development and Aging projects.	NeuroImage	Harms, Michael P; Somerville, Leah H; Ances, Beau M; Andersson, Jesper; Barch, Deanna M; Bastiani, Matteo; Bookheimer, Susan Y; Brown, Timothy B; Buckner, Randy L; Burgess, Gregory C; Coalson, Timothy S; Chappell, Michael A; Dapretto, Mirella; Douaud, Gwenaëlle; Fischl, Bruce; Glasser, Matthew F; Greve, Douglas N; Hodge, Cynthia; Jamison, Keith W; Jbabdi, Saad; Kandala, Sridhar; Li, Xiufeng; Mair, Ross W; Mangia, Silvia; Marcus, Daniel; Mascali, Daniele; Moeller, Steen; Nichols, Thomas E; Robinson, Emma C; Salat, David H; Smith, Stephen M; Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N; Terpstra, Melissa; Thomas, Kathleen M; Tisdall, M Dylan; Ugurbil, Kamil; van der Kouwe, Andre; Woods, Roger P; Zöllei, Lilla; Van Essen, David C; Yacoub, Essa	December 2018	Relevant
30142446	Create Study	The Lifespan Human Connectome Project in Development: A large-scale study of brain connectivity development in 5-21 year olds.	NeuroImage	Somerville, Leah H; Bookheimer, Susan Y; Buckner, Randy L; Burgess, Gregory C; Curtiss, Sandra W; Dapretto, Mirella; Elam, Jennifer Stine; Gaffrey, Michael S; Harms, Michael P; Hodge, Cynthia; Kandala, Sridhar; Kastman, Erik K; Nichols, Thomas E; Schlaggar, Bradley L; Smith, Stephen M; Thomas, Kathleen M; Yacoub, Essa; Van Essen, David C; Barch, Deanna M	December 2018	Relevant
29852283	Create Study	Automated processing pipeline for neonatal diffusion MRI in the developing Human Connectome Project.	NeuroImage	Bastiani, Matteo; Andersson, Jesper L R; Cordero-Grande, Lucilio; Murgasova, Maria; Hutter, Jana; Price, Anthony N; Makropoulos, Antonios; Fitzgibbon, Sean P; Hughes, Emer; Rueckert, Daniel; Victor, Suresh; Rutherford, Mary; Edwards, A David; Smith, Stephen M; Tournier, Jacques-Donald; Hajnal, Joseph V; Jbabdi, Saad; Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N	January 15, 2019	Not Determined
29277648	Create Study	Susceptibility-induced distortion that varies due to motion: Correction in diffusion MR without acquiring additional data.	NeuroImage	Andersson, Jesper L R; Graham, Mark S; Drobnjak, Ivana; Zhang, Hui; Campbell, Jon	May 1, 2018	Not Determined
28816791	Create Study	Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Human Connectome Project: Current Status and Relevance to Understanding Psychopathology.	Harvard review of psychiatry	Barch, Deanna M	September 1, 2017	Not Determined

helpcenter.collection.publications-tab

Collection - Publications

The number of Publications is displayed in parentheses next to the tab name. Clicking on any of the Publication Titles will open the Publication in a new internet browsing tab.

Collection Owners, Program Officers, and users with Submission or Administrative Privileges for the Collection may mark a publication as either Relevant or Not Relevant in the Status column.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I determine if a publication is relevant?

Publications are considered relevant to a collection when the data shared is directly related to the project or collection.
Where does the NDA get the publications?

PubMed, an online library containing journals, articles, and medical research. Sponsored by NiH and National Library of Medicine (NLM).

Glossary

Create Study

A link to the Create an NDA Study page that can be clicked to start creating an NDA Study with information such as the title, journal and authors automatically populated.
Not Determined Publication

Indicates that the publication has not yet been reviewed and/or marked as Relevant or Not Relevant so it has not been determined whether an NDA Study is expected.
Not Relevant Publication

A publication that is not based on data related to the aims of the grant/project associated with the Collection or not based on any data such as a review article and, therefore, an NDA Study is not expected to be created.
PubMed

PubMed provides citation information for biomedical and life sciences publications and is managed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine.
PubMed ID

The PUBMed ID is the unique ID number for the publication as recorded in the PubMed database.
Relevant Publication

A publication that is based on data related to the aims of the grant/project associated with the Collection and, therefore, an NDA Study is expected to be created.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Data Expected List: Mandatory Data Structures

These data structures are mandatory for your NDA Collection. Please update the Targeted Enrollment number to accurately represent the number of subjects you expect to submit for the entire study.

Data Expected	Targeted Enrollment	Initial Submission	Subjects Submitted	Initial Share	Subjects Shared	Status
Research Subject and Pedigree	655	03/31/2019	2,178	08/31/2020	652	Approved

You can use "Add New Data Expected" to add exsiting structures and create your project's list. However, this is also the method you can use to request new structures be created for your project. When adding the Data Expected item, if the structure already exists you can locate it and specify your dates and enrollment. To add a new structure and request it be defined in the Data Dictionary, select Upload Definition and attach the definition or material needed to create it, including manual, codebooks, forms, etc. If you have multiple files, please upload a zipped archive containing them all.

Expected dates should be selected based on the standard Data Sharing Regimen and are restricted to within date ranges based on the project start and end dates.

Data Expected List: Data Structures per Research Aims

These data structures are specific to your research aims and should list all data structures in which data will be collected and submitted for this NDA Collection. Please update the Targeted Enrollment number to accurately represent the number of subjects you expect to submit for the entire study.

Data Expected	Targeted Enrollment	Initial Submission	Subjects Submitted	Initial Share	Subjects Shared	Status
Perceived Stress Scale	1,000	09/16/2019	436	11/01/2019	436	Approved
Penn Emotion Recognition Task-40	1,000	09/16/2019	1,038	11/01/2019	629	Approved
Medical History	1,000	09/16/2019	1,304	11/01/2019	652	Approved
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)	1,200	02/02/2020	1,302	02/02/2021	651	Approved
NEO Personality Inventory	1,000	09/16/2019	468	11/01/2019	229	Approved
Demographics	1,000	08/19/2019	1,304	11/01/2019	652	Approved
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)	1,000	08/19/2019	1,069	11/01/2019	500	Approved
Vital Signs Assessment	1,000	09/16/2019	1,304	11/01/2019	652	Approved
Processed MRI Data	655	04/19/2019	652	08/31/2020	652	Approved
Pubertal Development Scale (PDS)	1,000	09/16/2019	1,303	11/01/2019	652	Approved
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children	1,000	09/16/2019	936	11/01/2019	462	Approved
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale	1,000	09/16/2019	342	11/01/2019	180	Approved
Substance Use Survey	1,000	09/16/2019	1,085	11/01/2019	629	Approved
Childrens Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ)	1,000	09/16/2019	309	11/01/2019	55	Approved
Kiddie-Sads (K-SADS)	1,200	02/02/2020	1,296	02/02/2021	0	Approved
Wechsler Preschool Primary Scale Intelligence (WPPSI)	1,000	09/16/2019	47	11/01/2019	2	Approved
Physical Exam	655	04/19/2019	1,001	08/31/2020	652	Approved
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index	1,000	09/16/2019	233	11/01/2019	151	Approved
Medications and Treatments Form	1,000	09/16/2019	1,304	11/01/2019	652	Approved
Picture Sequence Memory	1,000	11/02/2019	473	12/31/2019	473	Approved
Cognition Composite Scores	1,000	11/02/2019	471	12/31/2019	471	Approved
Pattern Comparison Processing Speed	1,000	11/02/2019	472	03/01/2020	472	Approved
List Sorting Working Memory Test	1,000	11/02/2019	472	03/01/2020	472	Approved
Youth Self Report	1,000	09/16/2019	663	11/01/2019	334	Approved
Drug Screen	1,000	11/02/2019	0	03/01/2020	0	Approved
Adult Self Report	1,000	09/16/2019	1,304	11/01/2019	151	Approved
Imaging (Structural, fMRI, DTI, PET, microscopy)	655	04/19/2019	652	08/31/2020	652	Approved
Psychological Well-Being Summary	1,000	08/19/2019	483	11/01/2019	483	Approved
Dimensional Change Card Sort Test	1,000	09/16/2019	472	11/01/2019	472	Approved
Broad Psychopathology Form	1,000	11/02/2019	673	03/01/2020	243	Approved
UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale	1,000	11/02/2019	1,301	03/01/2020	651	Approved
Social Isolation	1,000	11/01/2019	464	03/01/2020	464	Approved
Behavioral Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale	1,000	09/16/2019	1,301	11/01/2019	651	Approved
Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire	1,000	09/16/2019	1,070	11/01/2019	500	Approved
Delay Discounting Task	1,000	09/16/2019	1,232	11/01/2019	641	Approved
Blood Sample Collection	1,000	09/16/2019	1,304	11/01/2019	652	Approved
Flanker Task	1,000	11/02/2019	471	03/01/2020	471	Approved
Anger	1,000	11/01/2019	483	03/01/2020	483	Approved
Munich ChronoType Questionnaire	1,000	11/01/2019	854	03/01/2020	479	Approved
Mini Mental State Exam	1,000	11/01/2019	609	03/01/2020	340	Approved
Go-No Go Variant Task	1,000	11/01/2019	0	03/01/2020	0	Approved
NIH Toolbox Oral Reading Recognition Test	1,000	11/01/2019	472	03/01/2020	472	Approved
Picture Vocabulary Test	1,000	11/01/2019	471	03/01/2020	471	Approved
Self Efficacy Survey	1,000	11/01/2019	473	03/01/2020	473	Approved
NIH Toolbox Fear Anxiety Surveys	1,000	11/01/2019	362	03/01/2020	362	Approved
NIH Toolbox Motor Domain	1,000	11/01/2019	472	03/01/2020	472	Approved
Sadness Survey	1,000	11/01/2019	159	03/01/2020	159	Approved
NIH Toolbox Sensation Domain	1,000	11/01/2019	473	03/01/2020	473	Approved
NIH Toolbox Social Withdrawal	1,000	11/01/2019	159	03/01/2020	159	Approved
NIH Toolbox Emphatic Behavior Survey	1,000	11/01/2019	159	03/01/2020	159	Approved
NIH Toolbox Rejection Surveys	1,000	11/01/2019	482	03/01/2020	482	Approved
NIH Toolbox Friendship Survey	1,000	11/01/2019	464	03/01/2020	464	Approved
NIH Toolbox Perceived Hostility	1,000	11/01/2019	464	03/01/2020	464	Approved
Sports and Activities Involvement Questionnaire	1,000	11/01/2019	1,068	03/01/2020	500	Approved
Diagnostic Assessment Based on K-SADS	1,000	11/01/2019	0	03/01/2020	0	Approved
PROMIS General Life Satisfaction	1,000	11/01/2019	458	03/01/2020	458	Approved
Scanner Debriefing Interview	1,000	11/01/2019	637	03/01/2020	637	Approved
Guessing Task	1,000	11/01/2019	0	03/01/2020	0	Approved
General Behavior Inventory	1,000	11/01/2019	1,300	03/01/2020	651	Approved
Family Environment Scale	1,000	09/16/2019	1,304	11/01/2019	652	Approved
External Measures	1,000	11/01/2019	1,304	03/01/2020	652	Approved
Screen Time	1,000	11/01/2019	1,301	03/01/2020	651	Approved
Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire	1,000	11/01/2019	673	03/01/2020	243	Approved
Emotion Task	1,000	11/01/2019	0	03/01/2020	0	Approved
Language Experience Proficiency Questionnaire	1,000	11/01/2019	1,304	03/01/2020	652	Approved

Structure not yet defined

No Status history for this Data Expected has been recorded yet

helpcenter.collection.data-expected-tab

Collection - Data Expected

The Data Expected tab displays the list of all data that NDA expects to receive in association with the Collection as defined by the contributing researcher, as well as the dates for the expected initial upload of the data, and when it is first expected to be shared, or with the research community. Above the primary table of Data Expected, any publications determined to be relevant to the data within the Collection are also displayed - members of the contributing research group can use these to define NDA Studies, connecting those papers to underlying data in NDA.

The tab is used both as a reference for those accessing shared data, providing information on what is expected and when it will be shared, and as the primary tracking mechanism for contributing projects. It is used by both contributing primary researchers, secondary researchers, and NIH Program and Grants Management staff.

Contributing researchers just getting started on their project will need to define this list by adding all of the items they are collecting under their grant and setting their schedule according to the NDA Data Sharing Regimen. If you fall into this category, you can begin by clicking "Add New Data Expected" and selecting which data structures you will be using, saving the page after each change, or requesting new structures by adding and naming a new item, providing any materials NDA Data Dictionary Curators can use to help define your structure. For more information see the tutorial on creating Data Expected.

If you are a contributing researcher creating this list for the first time, or making changes to the list as your project progress, please note the following:

Although items you add to the list and changes you make are displayed, they are not committed to the system until you Save the entire page using the "Save" button at the bottom of your screen. Please Save after every change to ensure none of your work is lost.
If you attempt to add a new structure, the title you provide must be unique - if another structure exists with the same name your change will fail.
Adding a new structure to this list is the only way to request the creation of a new Data Dictionary definition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an NDA Data Structure?

An NDA Data Structure is comprised of multiple Data Elements to make up an electronic definition of an assessment, measure, questionnaire, etc will have a corresponding Data Structure.
What is the NDA Data Dictionary?

The NDA Data Dictionary is comprised of electronic definitions known as Data Structures.

Glossary

Analyzed Data

Data specific to the primary aims of the research being conducted (e.g. outcome measures, other dependent variables, observations, laboratory results, analyzed images, volumetric data, etc.) including processed images.
Data Item

Items listed on the Data Expected list in the Collection which may be an individual and discrete Data Structure, Data Structure Category, or Data Structure Group.
Data Structure

A defined organization and group of Data Elements to represent an electronic definition of a measure, assessment, questionnaire, or collection of data points. Data structures that have been defined in the NDA Data Dictionary are available at https://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=data-structure
Data Structure Category

An NDA term describing the affiliation of a Data Structure to a Category, which may be disease/disorder or diagnosis related (Depression, ADHD, Psychosis), specific to data type (MRI, eye tracking, omics), or type of data (physical exam, IQ).
Data Structure Group

A Data Item listed on the Data Expected tab of a Collection that indicates a group of Data Structures (e.g., ADOS or SCID) for which data may be submitted instead of a specific Data Structure identified by version, module, edition, etc. For example, the ADOS Data Structure Category includes every ADOS Data Structure such as ADOS Module 1, ADOS Module 2, ADOS Module 1 - 2nd Edition, etc. The SCID Data Structure Group includes every SCID Data Structure such as SCID Mania, SCID V Mania, SCID PTSD, SCID-V Diagnosis, and more.
Evaluated Data

A new Data Structure category, Evaluated Data is analyzed data resulting from the use of computational pipelines in the Cloud and can be uploaded directly back to a miNDAR database. Evaluated Data is expected to be listed as a Data Item in the Collection's Data Expected Tab.
Imaging Data

Imaging+ is an NDA term which encompasses all imaging related data including, but not limited to, images (DTI, MRI, PET, Structural, Spectroscopy, etc.) as well as neurosignal data (EEG, fMRI, MEG, EGG, eye tracking, etc.) and Evaluated Data.
Initial Share Date

Initial Submission and Initial Share dates should be populated according to the NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Any modifications to these will go through the approval processes outlined above. Data will be shared with authorized users upon publication (via an NDA Study) or 1-2 years after the grant end date specified on the first Notice of Award, as defined in the applicable Data Sharing Terms and Conditions.
Initial Submission Date

Initial Submission and Initial Share dates should be populated according to these NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Any modifications to these will go through the approval processes outlined above. Data for all subjects is not expected on the Initial Submission Date and modifications may be made as necessary based on the project's conduct.
Research Subject and Pedigree

An NDA created Data Structure used to convey basic information about the subject such as demographics, pedigree (links family GUIDs), diagnosis/phenotype, and sample location that are critical to allow for easier querying of shared data.
Submission Cycle

The NDA has two Submission Cycles per year - January 15 and July 15.
Submission Exemption

An interface to notify NDA that data may not be submitted during the upcoming/current submission cycle.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Associated Studies

Studies that have been defined using data from a Collection are important criteria to determine the value of data shared. The number of subjects column displays the counts from this Collection that are included in a Study, out of the total number of subjects in that study. The Data Use column represents whether or not the study is a primary analysis of the data or a secondary analysis. State indicates whether the study is private or shared with the research community.

Study NameFilter by Study Name	AbstractFilter by Abstract	Collection/Study SubjectsFilter by Collection/Study Subjects	Data UsageFilter by Data Usage	StateFilter by State
Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Neuroinflammation Metrics in Adolescents	Human obesity is related to alterations in brain structure and function. Rodent models of obesity show that diet-induced obesity causes neuroinflammation and impairment in learning and memory. In humans, non-invasive measurement of putative neuroinflammation is accomplished with diffusion-based magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. We have shown that, relative to normal-weight, obese adults have greater putative neuroinflammation, including indicators of cellularity and vasogenic edema, using diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) to model anisotropic and isotropic water diffusion in white matter tracts and regions of interest including hippocampus. Characterization of relationships between adiposity and brain structure and function in adolescents may provide insight into mechanisms underlying development of chronic overfeeding and obesity. Recently, Rapuano et al. (2020) used diffusion-based restricted spectrum imaging (RSI) to quantify putative neuroinflammation in reward-related brain regions in a large sample of 9 and 10 year old children enrolled in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) multi-site study and found that greater cellular density in the nucleus accumbens related to higher body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference at baseline and 1 year after MR imaging. We compared DBSI-measured putative neuroinflammation to those of RSI by selecting a sample of 9 and 10 year old children enrolled in the ABCD study representing a wide range of BMI categories (n=200 normal-weight; 50 overweight; 50 obese) and based on effect sizes and inclusion and exclusion criteria in the Rapuano et al. (2020) study. We hypothesize that greater neuroinflammation, as measured by DBSI, in white matter tracts and reward-related brain regions will relate to higher BMI and waist circumference at baseline and 1 year after MR imaging. Findings from the current study will provide insight into whether two different diffusion-based models yield convergent evidence regarding neuroinflammation and its relationship to adiposity in adolescents.	652/13751	Secondary Analysis	Private
Environmental Risk Factors and Psychotic-like Symptoms in Children Aged 9-11	Objective: Research implicates environmental risk factors, including correlates of urbanicity, deprivation, and environmental toxins, in psychotic-like experiences (PLEs). The current study examined associations between several types of environmental risk factors and PLEs in school-age children, whether these associations were specific to PLEs or generalized to other psychopathology, and examined possible neural mechanisms for significant associations. Method: The current study used data from 10,328 9-11-year-olds from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Hierarchical linear models examined associations between PLEs and geocoded environmental risk factors, and whether associations generalized to internalizing/externalizing symptoms. Mediation models examined whether structural MRI abnormalities (e.g., intracranial volume) mediated associations between PLEs and environmental risk factors. Results: The results found specific types of environmental risk factors, namely measures of urbanicity (i.e., drug offense exposure, less perception of neighborhood safety), deprivation (including overall deprivation, rate of poverty, fewer years at residence), and lead exposure risk, were associated with PLEs. These associations showed evidence of stronger associations with PLEs than internalizing/externalizing symptoms (especially overall deprivation, poverty, drug offense exposure, and lead exposure risk). There was evidence that brain volume mediated between 11-25% of the associations between poverty, perception of neighborhood safety, and lead exposure risk with PLEs. Conclusions: These results are the first to find support for neural measures partially mediating the association between PLEs and environmental exposures. Furthermore, the current study replicated and extended recent findings of the association between PLEs and environmental exposures, finding evidence for specific associations with correlates of urbanicity, deprivation, and lead exposure risk.	11/11898	Secondary Analysis	Private
A multi-cohort study of resting-state connectivity alterations in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder	Most studies examining connectomic abnormalities associated with ADHD have used small, underpowered samples and thus produced inconsistent findings. Here we combined data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) and Lifespan Human Connectome Project Development (HCP-D) cohorts (NDAR collections #2573, #2846 and #3165), as well as datasets from non-NDAR sources including the ADHD-200, Healthy Brain Network (HBN), National Consortium on Alcohol and Neurodevelopment in Adolescence (NCANDA) and Neurobehavioral Clinical Research (NCR) cohorts. We aimed to identify network-level resting-state features associated ADHD diagnosis and traits in this large multi-cohort sample. We applied the same 36-parameter+despiking pipeline to subjects from all datasets, and combined data using mega-analytic mixed models, which included nested random intercepts for study, site and family ID. In the group comparison, we compared 1301 subjects with diagnosed ADHD against 1301 unaffected controls (total N=2,602; 1710 males (65.72%); mean age=10.86 years, sd=2.05). Patients and controls were 1:1 nearest neighbor matched on in-scanner motion and key demographic variables. Associations between ADHD-traits and resting-state connectivity were assessed in a large multi-cohort sample (N=10,113). ADHD diagnosis was associated with less anticorrelation between the default mode and salience/ventral attention (B=0.009, t=3.45, p-FDR=0.004, d=0.14, 95% CI=0.004, 0.014), somatomotor (B=0.008, t=3.49, p-FDR=0.004, d=0.14, 95% CI=0.004, 0.013), and dorsal attention networks (B=0.01, t=4.28, p-FDR<0.001, d=0.17, 95% CI=0.006, 0.015). These results were robust to sensitivity analyses considering comorbid internalizing problems, externalizing problems and psychostimulant medication. Similar findings were observed when examining ADHD traits. Finding associations between ADHD and connectivity of the default mode to task-positive networks is consistent with default mode network models of disorder, although all effect sizes were small.	494/8817	Secondary Analysis	Private
Human Connectome Project-Development (HCP-D) Release 1.0	Initial release of data from the Human Connectome Project in Development (ages 5-21). Release includes basic demographic data (sex, age, race/ethnicity, handedness) and unprocessed imaging data for all modalities (structural, resting state fMRI, task fMRI, diffusion, and ASL) for 655 subjects and preprocessed structural imaging data for 84 subjects. Full release documentation available at: https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-lifespan-development/documentation.	655/655	Primary Analysis	Shared
TEST Human Connectome Project-Development (HCP-D) Release 2.0	The 2.0 release of data from the Human Connectome Project in Development (healthy participants, ages 5-21) includes visit 1 (V1) preprocessed structural and functional imaging data, unprocessed V1 imaging data for all modalities (structural, resting state fMRI, task fMRI, diffusion, and ASL), and non-imaging demographic and behavioral assessment data for 652 participants. For a detailed description of all the measures included in this release, download the Lifespan HCP Release 2.0 Reference Manual at: https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-lifespan-development/documentation.	655/655	Primary Analysis	Private
A new perspective of human callosal streamline topography in vivo tractography	Topography of human callosal fibers in the midsagittal corpus callosum (mid-CC) in term of their cortical termination, which had seldom been studied in children, is inconsistent in literature. Even being a high-profile but controversial theme, heterotopic callosal bundles (HeCBs) have not been studied from a whole-brain perspective. Here, we used multimodal MRI data from Human Connectome Project-Development to explore these two topographic aspects with combination of whole brain tractography based on MSMT-CSD, post-tractography reducing-false-positive-streamline algorithm of COMMIT2 and the newly cortex parcellation atlas of HCP_MMP1.0.	652/652	Primary Analysis	Private
Analyzing pediatric head movement during task-based functional MRI	Background: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data can be particularly susceptible to noise from head motion in pediatric groups. Despite the abundance of methods to reduce head motion in pediatric populations, there has been little work on characterizing head motion in children during different task fmri conditions. Methods: This study utilizes a large public dataset (N=652, age 5-22y, The Lifespan Human Connectome Project Development Study) to compare head motion across age groups and four different scan conditions (Rest, Inhibitory Control task, Guessing task, and Emotion task). Head motion was quantified by calculating framewise displacement (fd) for each subject and condition from the motion parameter files generated by the studǇ͛s preprocessing pipeline. Results: As expected, fd decreased as age increased, with those 13 and younger exhibiting the most motion. Participants tended to exhibit the most head motion on the Inhibitory Control task, and the least on the Emotion task. This difference in head motion across scan conditions was most pronounced for the younger age groups. There was also a significant negative correlation between the mean fd and task performance on the Inhibitory Control task, indicating that those who moved more also exhibited worse response inhibition. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that different scan conditions lead to differences in head motion among pediatric participants. A more cognitively engaging, but relatively simple task (i.e., the Emotion task) led to less head motion than an equally engaging, but more difficult task (i.e., the Inhibitory Control task). While individual differences exist, age plays the largest role in determining head motion. Older individuals that have less difficulty performing a task also tended to move less. While pediatric participants exhibit more head motion than adults, future investigators may increase their success by using task components associated with less head motion	652/652	Secondary Analysis	Private
Decoding Age-specific Changes in Brain Functional Connectivity Using a Sliding-window Based Clustering Method	Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) permits detailed study of human brain function. Understanding the age-specific development of neural circuits in the typically developing brain may help us generate new hypotheses for developmental psychopathologies. Functional connectivity (FC), defined as the statistical associations between two brain regions, has been widely used in estimating functional networks from fMRI data. Previous research has shown that the evolution of FC does not follow a linear trend, particularly from childhood to young adulthood. Thus, this work aims to detect the nuanced FC changes with age from the non-linear curves and identify age-period-specific FC development patterns. We proposed a sliding-window based clustering approach to identify refined age interval of FC development. We used resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data from the human connectome project-development (HCP-D), which recruited children, adolescents, and young adults aged from 5 to 21 years. Our analyses revealed different developmental patterns of resting-state FC by sex. In general, females matured earlier than males, but males had a faster development rate during age 100 -120 months. We identified four developmental phases: network construction in late childhood, segregation and integration construction in adolescence, network pruning in young adulthood, and a unique phase in males -- U-shape development. In addition, we investigated the sex effect on the slopes of FC-age correlation. Males had higher slopes during late childhood and young adulthood. These results inform trajectories of normal FC development, information that can in the future be used to pinpoint when development might go awry in neurodevelopmental disorders.	652/652	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Human Connectome Project-Development (HCP-D) Release 2.0	The 2.0 release of data from the Human Connectome Project in Development (healthy participants, ages 5-21) includes visit 1 (V1) preprocessed structural and functional imaging data, unprocessed V1 imaging data for all modalities (structural, resting state fMRI, task fMRI, diffusion, and ASL), and non-imaging demographic and behavioral assessment data for 652 participants. For details of all the measures included in this release and access instructions see the Lifespan HCP-Development Release 2.0 documentation link below.	652/652	Primary Analysis	Shared
Psychological Resilience and Neurodegenerative Risk: A Connectomics-Transcriptomics Investigation in Healthy Adolescent and Middle-Aged Females	Adverse life events can inflict substantial long-term damage, which, paradoxically, has been posited to stem from initially adaptative responses to the challenges encountered in one’s environment. Thus, identification of the mechanisms linking resilience against recent stressors to longer-term psychological vulnerability is key to understanding optimal functioning across multiple timescales. To address this issue, our study tested the relevance of neuro-reproductive maturation and senescence, respectively, to both resilience and longer-term risk for pathologies characterised by accelerated brain aging, specifically, Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Graph theoretical and partial least squares analyses were conducted on multimodal imaging, reported biological aging and recent adverse experience data from the Lifespan Human Connectome Project (HCP). Availability of reproductive maturation/senescence measures restricted our investigation to adolescent (N =178) and middle-aged (N=146) females. Psychological resilience was linked to age-specific brain senescence patterns suggestive of precocious functional development of somatomotor and control-relevant networks (adolescence) and earlier aging of default mode and salience/ventral attention systems (middle adulthood). Biological aging showed complementary associations with the neural patterns relevant to resilience in adolescence (positive relationship) versus middle-age (negative relationship). Transcriptomic and expression quantitative trait locus data analyses linked the neural aging patterns correlated with psychological resilience in middle adulthood to gene expression patterns suggestive of increased AD risk. Our results imply a partially antagonistic relationship between resilience against proximal stressors and longer-term psychological adjustment in later life. They thus underscore the importance of fine-tuning extant views on successful coping by considering the multiple timescales across which age-specific processes may unfold.	178/324	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Modelling the Developing Connectome - Graph Representation Learning with Variational Autoencoders	The functional development of the human brain exhibits high inter-subject variability, which is influenced by factors such as genetic predisposition, environmental influences and individual learning experiences. A broadly accessible imaging modality for analysis of the brain’s functional development is found in resting state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI), a non-invasive imaging technique covering the whole brain. However, analysis of rs-fMRI data in the context of developmental studies is challenging. Compared to adults, paediatric cohorts show higher in-scanner movement, which leads to erroneous intensity changes in the signal. Such artefacts, if not accounted for, lead to systematic errors in subsequent rs-fMRI analysis. Furthermore, approaches for developmental rs- fMRI analysis must be able to capture general trends rather than individual differences due to inter-subject variability. In this work, a framework for analysis of the topological properties of the developing brain is presented. First, a paediatric preprocessing pipeline is developed and evaluated for its performance in removing in-scanner-movement-related artefacts. Second, an adaption of the graph-based Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is developed for representation learning on brain graphs derived from developmental rs- fMRI data in the age range of 7.5 to 18.5 years. Additionally, a graph-based conditional VAE is proposed, with the goal to enhance the VAE representation learning abilities. Furthermore, the VAEs are compared to a Bayesian regression baseline. The evaluation of the VAE-based approaches is threefold: First, the models’ brain graph reconstruction capabilities are evaluated in terms of the Mean Squared Error (MSE) and a correlation-based error measure. Second, the quality of datasets generated by the models is measured in terms of Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) based on graph statistics distributions. Finally, the ability to capture developmental trajectories of a developmental dataset is investigated by statistical analysis using Network Based Statistic (NBS). Results show that the developmental processes available in the used dataset cannot be modelled exactly by the presented modelling approaches. Additionally, extending the VAE with a condition does not improve its representation learning capabilities. However, trends, such as the continuous development of the Default Mode Network (DMN), are captured successfully by the graph-based VAE.	249/249	Primary Analysis	Shared
In humans, striato-pallido-thalamic projections are largely segregated by their origin in either the matrix or striosome compartments	Cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loops (CSTCs) are a fundamental organizing unit in the mammalian brain. CSTCs process limbic, associative, and sensorimotor information in largely segregated but interacting networks. The striatal limb of CTSC loops passes through the striatal compartments, striosome (aka patch) and matrix, twin pools of medium spiny neurons (MSNs) that have distinct embryologic origins, cortical and subcortical structural connectivity, susceptibility to injuries, and roles in animal behavior and human diseases. Striatal dopamine modulates basal activity in striosome and matrix in opposite directions, and striosomes alone project directly to nigral dopaminergic neurons. If CSTC projections favor one compartment, this segregation may be an anatomical basis for regulating discrete functions. We recently demonstrated that differential structural connectivity, as measured by probabilistic diffusion tractography, can distinguish striosome-like and matrix-like compartments in the living human striatum. We used this technique to assess compartment-level biases in the striato-pallido-thalamic limb of CSTCs in 221 healthy adults. Streamlines originating in striosome-like and matrix-like voxels diverge at the levels of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) and the thalamic nuclei. Compartment-specific streamlines were anatomically segregated at the level of the GPi: striosome connectivity was significantly more rostral, ventral, and lateral. Streamlines that originated in matrix-like voxels were 5.7-fold more likely to reach the GPi, recapitulating abundance measures in animal tract-tracing studies. Twenty thalamic nuclei met criteria for quantification: striosome-like connectivity dominated in nine nuclei; matrix-like connectivity dominated in eight nuclei; three nuclei had no significant bias. For 18 of 20 thalamic nuclei, matrix-like connectivity was lateralized (left>right hemisphere), independent of whether the nucleus was matrix-biased, striosome-biased, or neutral. These biases in structural connectivity suggest that routing CSTC loops through striosome or matrix is a fundamental mechanism for organizing and regulating behavior. Moreover, compartment-specific characterization may improve localization of striatal, pallidal, and thalamic pathologies in humans.	10/98	Secondary Analysis	Private

* Data not on individual level

helpcenter.collection.associated-studies-tab

Collection - Associated Studies

Clicking on the Study Title will open the study details in a new internet browser tab. The Abstract is available for viewing, providing the background explanation of the study, as provided by the Collection Owner.

Primary v. Secondary Analysis: The Data Usage column will have one of these two choices. An associated study that is listed as being used for Primary Analysis indicates at least some and potentially all of the data used was originally collected by the creator of the NDA Study. Secondary Analysis indicates the Study owner was not involved in the collection of data, and may be used as supporting data.

Private v. Shared State: Studies that remain private indicate the associated study is only available to users who are able to access the collection. A shared study is accessible to the general public.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I associate a study to my collection?

Studies are associated to the Collection automatically when the data is defined in the Study.

Glossary

Associated Studies Tab

A tab in a Collection that lists the NDA Studies that have been created using data from that Collection including both Primary and Secondary Analysis NDA Studies.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Edit

Description
Value Range
Notes
Data Structures with shared data

Choose File:	Select File
File Type:
Description:

Exemption Type*
From Date*
To Date*
Reason*	Characters Remaining:

New Password:
Repeat New Password:

Switch to username*