NIMH Data Archive - Data

Genomics

Neuroimaging

Phenotype¹

New Trial
Clinical Trial

¹ Numbers reported are subjects by age

New Project
Grant/Project Number

Format should be in the following format: Activity Code, Institute Abbreviation, and Serial Number. Grant Type, Support Year, and Suffix should be excluded. For example, grant 1R01MH123456-01A1 should be entered R01MH123456

Collection - Use Existing Experiment

To associate an experiment to the current collection, just select an axperiment from the table below then click the associate experiment button to persist your changes (saving the collection is not required). Note that once an experiment has been associated to two or more collections, the experiment will not longer be editable.

The table search feature is case insensitive and targets the experiment id, experiment name and experiment type columns. The experiment id is searched only when the search term entered is a number, and filtered using a startsWith comparison. When the search term is not numeric the experiment name is used to filter the results.

Select	Experiment Id	Experiment Name	Experiment Type	Created On

24	HI-NGS_R1	Omics	02/16/2011
475	MB1-10 (CHOP)	Omics	06/07/2016
490	Illumina Infinium PsychArray BeadChip Assay	Omics	07/07/2016
501	PharmacoBOLD Resting State	fMRI	07/27/2016
506	PVPREF	Omics	08/05/2016
509	ABC-CT Resting v2	EEG	08/18/2016
13	Comparison of FI expression in Autistic and Neurotypical Homo Sapiens	Omics	12/28/2010
18	AGRE/Broad Affymetrix 5.0 Genotype Experiment	Omics	01/06/2011
22	Stitching PCR Sequencing	Omics	02/14/2011
26	ASD_Methylation	Omics	03/01/2011
29	Microarray family 03 (father, mother, sibling)	Omics	03/24/2011
37	Standard paired-end sequencing of BCRs	Omics	04/19/2011
38	Illumina Mate-Pair BCR sequencing	Omics	04/19/2011
39	Custom Jumping Libraries	Omics	04/19/2011
40	Custom CapBP	Omics	04/19/2011
41	Immunofluorescence	Omics	05/11/2011
43	Autism brain sample genotyping, Illumina	Omics	05/16/2011
47	ARRA Autism Sequencing Collaboration at Baylor. SOLiD 4 System	Omics	08/01/2011
53	AGRE Omni1-quad	Omics	10/11/2011
59	AGP genotyping	Omics	04/03/2012
60	Ultradeep 454 sequencing of synaptic genes from postmortem cerebella of individuals with ASD and neurotypical controls	Omics	06/23/2012
63	Microemulsion PCR and Targeted Resequencing for Variant Detection in ASD	Omics	07/20/2012
76	Whole Genome Sequencing in Autism Families	Omics	01/03/2013
519	Resting	fMRI	11/08/2016
90	Genotyped IAN Samples	Omics	07/09/2013
91	NJLAGS Axiom Genotyping Array	Omics	07/16/2013
93	AGP genotyping (CNV)	Omics	09/06/2013
106	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 2	EEG	11/07/2013
107	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 3	EEG	11/07/2013
108	Longitudinal Sleep Study. AURA 200	EEG	11/07/2013
105	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 1	EEG	11/07/2013
109	Longitudinal Sleep Study. AURA 400	EEG	11/07/2013
116	Gene Expression Analysis WG-6	Omics	01/07/2014
131	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Charlie Brown and Sesame Street - Project 1	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
132	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Animacy - Project 1	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
133	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Mom Stranger - Project 2	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
134	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Face Emotion - Project 3	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
145	AGRE/FMR1_Illumina.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
146	AGRE/MECP2_Sanger.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
147	AGRE/MECP2_Junior.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
151	Candidate Gene Identification in familial Autism	Omics	06/09/2014
152	NJLAGS Whole Genome Sequencing	Omics	07/01/2014
154	Math Autism Study - Vinod Menon	fMRI	07/15/2014
155	Resting	fMRI	07/25/2014
156	Speech	fMRI	07/25/2014
159	Emotion	fMRI	07/25/2014
160	syllable contrast	EEG	07/29/2014
167	School-age naturalistic stimuli	Eye Tracking	09/19/2014
44	AGRE/Broad Affymetrix 5.0 Genotype Experiment	Omics	06/27/2011
45	Exome Sequencing of 20 Sporadic Cases of Autism Spectrum Disorder	Omics	07/15/2011

Collection - Add Experiment

Add Supporting Documentation

Funding Source:
URL:

Request Submission Exemption

Not Eligible

The Data Expected list for this Collection shows some raw data as missing. Contact the NDA Help Desk with any questions.

Please confirm that you will not be enrolling any more subjects and that all raw data has been collected and submitted.

Collection Updated

Your Collection is now in Data Analysis phase and exempt from biannual submissions. Analyzed data is still expected prior to publication or no later than the project end date.

[CMS] Error

[CMS]

Unable to change collection phase where targeted enrollment is less than 90%

You have requested to move the sharing dates for the following assessments:

Data Expected Item	Original Sharing Date	New Sharing Date

Please provide a reason for this change, which will be sent to the Program Officers listed within this collection:

Explanation must be between 20 and 200 characters in length.

Please press Save or Cancel

HCP-A Mapping the Human Connectome During Typical Aging #2847 Collection State:Shared

General
Experiments (4)
Shared Data
Publications (52)
Data Expected (35)
Associated Studies (15)

Collection Title	Collection Investigators	Collection Description
Collection Title:	HCP-A Mapping the Human Connectome During Typical Aging
Collection Investigators:	Beau Ances, Susan Bookheimer, Randy Buckner, David Salat, Stephen Smith, Melissa Terpstra, Kamil Ugurbil, David Van Essen, Roger Woods
Collection Description:	The major technological and analytical advances in human brain imaging achieved as part of the Human Connectome Projects (HCP) enable examination of structural and functional brain connectivity at unprecedented levels of spatial and temporal resolution. This information is proving invaluable for enhancing our understanding of normative variation in young adult brain connectivity. It is now timely to use the tools and analytical approaches developed by the HCP to understand how structural and functional wiring of the brain changes during the aging process. Using state-of-the art HCP imaging approaches will allow investigators to push our currently limited understanding of normative brain aging to new levels. We propose an effort involving a consortium of five sites (Massachusetts General Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, University of Minnesota, Washington University in St. Louis, and Oxford University), with extensive complementary expertise in human brain imaging and aging and including many investigators associated with the original adult and pilot lifespan HCP efforts. This synergistic integration of advances from the MGH and WU-MINN-OXFORD HCPs with cutting-edge expertise in aging provides an unprecedented opportunity to advance our understanding of the normative changes in human brain connectivity with aging. Aim 1 will be to optimize existing HCP Lifespan Pilot project protocols to respect practical constraints in studying adults over a wide age range, including the very old (80+ years). Aim 2 will be to collect high quality neuroimaging, behavioral, and other datasets on 1200 individuals in the age range of 36 - 100+ years, using matched protocols across sites. This will enable robust cross-sectional analyses of age-related changes in network properties including metrics of connectivity, network integrity, response properties during tasks, and behavior. Aim 3 will be to collect and analyze longitudinal data on a subset of 300 individuals in three understudied and scientifically interesting groups: ages 36-44 (when late maturational and early aging processes may co-occur); ages 45-59 (perimenopausal, when rapid hormonal changes can affect cognition and the brain); and ages 80 - 100+ (the `very old', whose brains may reflect a `healthy survivor' state). The information gained relating to these important periods will enhance our understanding of how important phenomena such as hormonal changes affect the brain and will provide insights into factors that enable cognitively intact function into advanced aging. Aim 4 will capitalize on our success in sharing data in the Human Connectome Project (HCP), and will use these established tools, platforms, and procedures to make this data publicly available through the Connectome Coordination Facility.
Data Repository:	Connectome Coordination Facility
Permission Group:
Collection Creation Date:	01/29/2018
NIH Research Initiative:	Human Connectome Project (HCP)
Collection Phase:	Funding Completed
Collection Sub-Phase:	Close Out
Collection State:	Shared
Blinded Clinical Trial:	No
Total Funded Amount:	$3,760,565.00
Subjects Shared:	725

{"values":[]}

Loading Chart...

Funding Sources:

Funding Source Name	Funding Source URL
NIH - Extramural	None

Supporting Documentation:

File Name	File Type	Description	Audience
1-Supp_Bookheimer_LS_HCA.docx	Background	tesat	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/LS_Release_2.0_Access_Instructions.pdf	Results	Detailed instructions on applying for NDA access to Lifespan 2.0 Release HCP-Aging & HCP-Development data, selecting, and downloading data with download manager and on the command line.	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/LS2.0_Crosswalk_Behavioral_Data_Dictionary.xlsx	Results	Crosswalk .xlsx spreadsheet linking behavioral NDA structures and elements to the original HCP variable descriptions. hcp description column is current best data dictionary for variables and answer codes as of the Lifespan 2.0 Release.	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/HCA_LS_2.0_subject_completeness.csv	Results	CSV containing per subject completeness of imaging modalities, QC issue codes, behavioral data availability, and unrelated status for finding subjects of interest for analyses.	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/LS_2.0_Release_Appendix_2.pdf	Results	Lifespan 2.0 Release HCP-Aging and HCP-Development: Details and References for Behavioral & Clinical Instruments	General Public
https://www.humanconnectome.org/storage/app/media/documentation/LS2.0/LS_2.0_Release_Appendix_1.pdf	Results	File names and directory structure of Lifespan 2.0 Release HCP-Aging and HCP-Development preprocessed and unprocessed imaging data. Organized by OPTION 2 filters/HCP package names on NDA HCP Aging & Development query page.	General Public

Grant Information:

Project Number	Project Title	Start Date	End Date	Planned Enrollment	Actual Enrollment	Organization	Funds Obligated
U01AG052564-01	Mapping the Human Connectome During Typical Aging	08/19/2016	05/31/2020	3600	5850	WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY	$3,760,565.00

Clinical Trials:

helpcenter.collection.general-tab

Collection - General Tab

Fields available for edit on the top portion of the page include:

Collection Title
Investigators
Collection Description
Collection Phase
Funding Source
Clinical Trials

Collection Status: The visibility status of an NDA Collection. Collection Status can be Shared or Private. Collections in Shared status are visible to all users and can be searched in the NDA Query Tool. Private Collections are not visible to NDA users. The Status of an NDA Collection only affects the visibility of information about the Collection (metadata) and does not relate to the status of the record-level research data in the NDA Collection.

Collection Phase: The current status of a research project submitting data to an NDA Collection, based on the timing of the award and/or the data that have been submitted.

Pre-Enrollment: The default entry made when the NDA Collection is created.
Enrolling: Data have been submitted to the NDA Collection or the NDA Data Expected initial submission date has been reached for at least one data structure category in the NDA Collection.
Data Analysis: Subject level data collection for the research project is completed and has been submitted to the NDA Collection. The NDA Collection owner or the NDA Help Desk may set this phase when they’ve confirmed data submission is complete and submitted subject counts match at least 90% of the target enrollment numbers in the NDA Data Expected. Data submission reminders will be turned off for the NDA Collection.
Funding Completed: The NIH grant award (or awards) associated with the NDA Collection has reached its end date. NDA Collections in Funding Completed phase are assigned a subphase to indicate the status of data submission.
- The Data Expected Subphase indicates that NDA expects more data will be submitted
- The Closeout Subphase indicates the data submission is complete.
- The Sharing Not Met Subphase indicates that data submission was not completed as expected.

Blinded Clinical Trial Status:

This status is set by a Collection Owner and indicates the research project is a double blinded clinical trial. When selected, the public view of Data Expected will show the Data Expected items and the Submission Dates, but the targeted enrollment and subjects submitted counts will not be displayed.
Targeted enrollment and subjects submitted counts are visible only to NDA Administrators and to the NDA Collection or as the NDA Collection Owner.
When an NDA Collection that is flagged Blinded Clinical Trial reaches the maximum data sharing date for that Data Repository (see https://nda.nih.gov/nda/sharing-regimen.html), the embargo on Data Expected information is released.

Funding Source

The organization(s) responsible for providing the funding is listed here.

Supporting Documentation

Users with Submission privileges, as well as Collection Owners, Program Officers, and those with Administrator privileges, may upload and attach supporting documentation. By default, supporting documentation is shared to the general public, however, the option is also available to limit this information to qualified researchers only.

Grant Information

Identifiable details are displayed about the Project of which the Collection was derived from. You may click in the Project Number to view a full report of the Project captured by the NIH.

Clinical Trials

Any data that is collected to support or further the research of clinical studies will be available here. Collection Owners and those with Administrator privileges may add new clinical trials.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) determine which Permission Group data are submitted into?

During Collection creation, NDA staff determine the appropriate Permission Group based on the type of data to be submitted, the type of access that will be available to data access users, and the information provided by the Program Officer during grant award.
How do I know when a NDA Collection has been created?

When a Collection is created by NDA staff and marked as Shared, an email notification will automatically be sent to the PI(s) of the grant(s) associated with the Collection to notify them.
Is a single grant number ever associated with more than one Collection?

The NDA system does not allow for a single grant to be associated with more than one Collection; therefore, a single grant will not be listed in the Grant Information section of a Collection for more than one Collection.
Why is there sometimes more than one grant included in a Collection?

In general, each Collection is associated with only one grant; however, multiple grants may be associated if the grant has multiple competing segments for the same grant number or if multiple different grants are all working on the same project and it makes sense to hold the data in one Collection (e.g., Cooperative Agreements).

Glossary

Administrator Privilege

A privilege provided to a user associated with an NDA Collection or NDA Study whereby that user can perform a full range of actions including providing privileges to other users.
Collection Owner

Generally, the Collection Owner is the contact PI listed on a grant. Only one NDA user is listed as the Collection owner. Most automated emails are primarily sent to the Collection Owner.
Collection Phase
The Collection Phase provides information on data submission as opposed to grant/project completion so while the Collection phase and grant/project phase may be closely related they are often different. Collection users with Administrative Privileges are encouraged to edit the Collection Phase. The Program Officer as listed in eRA (for NIH funded grants) may also edit this field. Changes must be saved by clicking the Save button at the bottom of the page. This field is sortable alphabetically in ascending or descending order. Collection Phase options include:
- Pre-Enrollment: A grant/project has started, but has not yet enrolled subjects.
- Enrolling: A grant/project has begun enrolling subjects. Data submission is likely ongoing at this point.
- Data Analysis: A grant/project has completed enrolling subjects and has completed all data submissions.
- Funding Completed: A grant/project has reached the project end date.
Collection State

The Collection State indicates whether the Collection is viewable and searchable. Collections can be either Private, Shared, or an Ongoing Study. A Collection that is shared does not necessarily have shared data as the Collection State and state of data are independent of each other. This field can be edited by Collection users with Administrative Privileges and the Program Officer as listed in eRA (for NIH funded grants). Changes must be saved by clicking the Save button at the bottom of the page.
Collection Title

An editable field with the title of the Collection, which is often the title of the grant associated with the Collection.
Grant

Provides the grant number(s) for the grant(s) associated with the Collection. The field is a hyperlink so clicking on the Grant number will direct the user to the grant information in the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) page.
Supporting Documentation

Various documents and materials to enable efficient use of the data by investigators unfamiliar with the project and may include the research protocol, questionnaires, and study manuals.
NIH Research Initiative

NDA Collections may be organized by scientific similarity into NIH Research Initiatives, to facilitate query tool user experience. NIH Research Initiatives map to one or multiple Funding Opportunity Announcements.
Permission Group

Access to shared record-level data in NDA is provisioned at the level of a Permission Group. NDA Permission Groups consist of one or multiple NDA Collections that contain data with the same subject consents.
Planned Enrollment

Number of human subject participants to be enrolled in an NIH-funded clinical research study. The data is provided in competing applications and annual progress reports.
Actual Enrollment

Number of human subjects enrolled in an NIH-funded clinical research study. The data is provided in annual progress reports.
NDA Collection

A virtual container and organization structure for data and associated documentation from one grant or one large project/consortium. It contains tools for tracking data submission and allows investigators to define a wide array of other elements that provide context for the data, including all general information regarding the data and source project, experimental parameters used to collect any event-based data contained in the Collection, methods, and other supporting documentation. They also allow investigators to link underlying data to an NDA Study, defining populations and subpopulations specific to research aims.
Data Use Limitations

Data Use Limitations (DULs) describe the appropriate secondary use of a dataset and are based on the original informed consent of a research participant. NDA only accepts consent-based data use limitations defined by the NIH Office of Science Policy.
Total Subjects Shared

The total number of unique subjects for whom data have been shared and are available for users with permission to access data.

Contact NDA Help Desk

ID	Name	Created Date	Status	Type
1215	CARIT (Go/Nogo) Task	02/20/2019	Approved	fMRI
1216	Vismotor Task	02/20/2019	Approved	fMRI
1217	FaceName Task	02/20/2019	Approved	fMRI
1218	Resting State	02/20/2019	Approved	fMRI

helpcenter.collection.experiments-tab

Collection - Experiments

The number of Experiments included is displayed in parentheses next to the tab name. You may download all experiments associated with the Collection via the Download button. You may view individual experiments by clicking the Experiment Name and add them to the Filter Cart via the Add to Cart button.

Collection Owners, Program Officers, and users with Submission or Administrative Privileges for the Collection may create or edit an Experiment.

Please note: The creation of an NDA Experiment does not necessarily mean that data collected, according to the defined Experiment, has been submitted or shared.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an Experiment be associated with more than one Collection?
Yes -see the “Copy” button in the bottom left when viewing an experiment. There are two actions that can be performed via this button:
1. Copy the experiment with intent for modifications.
2. Associate the experiment to the collection. No modifications can be made to the experiment.

Glossary

Experiment Status

An Experiment must be Approved before data using the associated Experiment_ID may be uploaded.
Experiment ID

The ID number automatically generated by NDA which must be included in the appropriate file when uploading data to link the Experiment Definition to the subject record.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Shared Data

Data structures with the number of subjects submitted and shared are provided.

Shared Data:

Title	Type	Number of Subjects
Adult Self Report	Clinical Assessments	720
Blood Sample Collection	Clinical Assessments	725
Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury	Clinical Assessments	725
Clinical Medical History	Clinical Assessments	715
Cognition Composite Scores	Clinical Assessments	632
Current Menstrual State and Menstrual History	Clinical Assessments	406
Delay Discounting Task	Clinical Assessments	719
Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (DCCS)	Clinical Assessments	633
Edinburgh Handedness Inventory	Clinical Assessments	725
FaceName Task	Clinical Assessments	686
Flanker Task	Clinical Assessments	633
Geriatric Adverse Life Events Scale	Clinical Assessments	723
Image	Imaging	725
Imaging Collection	Imaging	725
International Physical Activity Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	725
Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	725
Lawton and Brody Activities of Daily Living	Clinical Assessments	339
Medications and Treatments Form	Clinical Assessments	725
Montreal Cognitive Assessment	Clinical Assessments	725
NEO-Five Factor Inventory	Clinical Assessments	725
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Emotional Support Survey	Clinical Assessments	632
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Friendship Survey	Clinical Assessments	632
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Peer Rejection and Perceived Rejection Surveys	Clinical Assessments	632
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Perceived Hostility Surveys	Clinical Assessments	632
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Psychological Well-Being	Clinical Assessments	632
NIH Toolbox Emotion Domain - Self-Efficacy Survey	Clinical Assessments	632
NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test	Clinical Assessments	634
NIH Toolbox Motor Domain	Clinical Assessments	634
NIH Toolbox Oral Reading Recognition Test	Clinical Assessments	634
NIH Toolbox Picture Vocabulary Test	Clinical Assessments	634
NIH Toolbox Sensation Domain	Clinical Assessments	633
PROMIS Anger	Clinical Assessments	632
PROMIS Emotional Distress - Depression	Clinical Assessments	632
PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety	Clinical Assessments	632
PROMIS General Life Satisfaction	Clinical Assessments	602
PROMIS Social Isolation	Clinical Assessments	632
Pattern Comparison Processing Speed	Clinical Assessments	634
Penn Emotion Recognition Task	Clinical Assessments	723
Perceived Stress Scale	Clinical Assessments	632
Picture Sequence Memory	Clinical Assessments	634
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index	Clinical Assessments	725
Processed MRI Data	Imaging	725
Research Subject	Clinical Assessments	725
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test	Clinical Assessments	720
SSAGA Cover Page and Demographics	Clinical Assessments	719
Scanner Debriefing Interview	Clinical Assessments	715
Trail Making Test, Child and Adult	Clinical Assessments	724
Vital Signs	Clinical Assessments	725

helpcenter.collection.shared-data-tab

Collection - Shared Data

This tab provides a quick overview of the Data Structure title, Data Type, and Number of Subjects that are currently Shared for the Collection. The information presented in this tab is automatically generated by NDA and cannot be edited. If no information is visible on this tab, this would indicate the Collection does not have shared data or the data is private.

The shared data is available to other researchers who have permission to access data in the Collection's designated Permission Group(s). Use the Download button to get all shared data from the Collection to the Filter Cart.

Frequently Asked Questions

How will I know if another researcher uses data that I shared through the NIMH Data Archive (NDA)?

To see what data your project have submitted are being used by a study, simply go the Associated Studies tab of your collection. Alternatively, you may review an NDA Study Attribution Report available on the General tab.
Can I get a supplement to share data from a completed research project?

Often it becomes more difficult to organize and format data electronically after the project has been completed and the information needed to create a GUID may not be available; however, you may still contact a program staff member at the appropriate funding institution for more information.
Can I get a supplement to share data from a research project that is still ongoing?

Unlike completed projects where researchers may not have the information needed to create a GUID and/or where the effort needed to organize and format data becomes prohibitive, ongoing projects have more of an opportunity to overcome these challenges. Please contact a program staff member at the appropriate funding institution for more information.

Glossary

Data Structure

A defined organization and group of Data Elements to represent an electronic definition of a measure, assessment, questionnaire, or collection of data points. Data structures that have been defined in the NDA Data Dictionary are available at https://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=data-structure
Data Type

A grouping of data by similar characteristics such as Clinical Assessments, Omics, or Neurosignal data.
Shared

The term 'Shared' generally means available to others; however, there are some slightly different meanings based on what is Shared. A Shared NDA Collection or NDA Study is viewable and searchable publicly regardless of the user's role or whether the user has an NDA account. A Shared Collection or NDA Study does not necessarily mean that data submitted to the Collection or used in the NDA Study have been shared as this is independently determined. Data are shared according the schedule defined in a Collection's Data Expected Tab and/or in accordance with data sharing expectations in the NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Additionally, Supporting Documentation uploaded to a Collection may be shared independent of whether data are shared, but will only be viewable and accessible if the Collection is Shared.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Publications

Publications relevant to NDA data are listed below. Most displayed publications have been associated with the grant within Pubmed. Use the "+ New Publication" button to add new publications. Publications relevant/not relevant to data expected are categorized. Relevant publications are then linked to the underlying data by selecting the Create Study link. Study provides the ability to define cohorts, assign subjects, define outcome measures and lists the study type, data analysis and results. Analyzed data and results are expected in this way.

PubMed ID	Study	Title	Journal	Authors	Date	Status
36595679	Create Study	Anatomically interpretable deep learning of brain age captures domain-specific cognitive impairment.	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America	Yin, Chenzhong; Imms, Phoebe; Cheng, Mingxi; Amgalan, Anar; Chowdhury, Nahian F; Massett, Roy J; Chaudhari, Nikhil N; Chen, Xinghe; Thompson, Paul M; Bogdan, Paul; Irimia, Andrei; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative	January 10, 2023	Not Determined
36563018	Create Study	Sex differences in default mode network connectivity in healthy aging adults.	Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)	Ficek-Tani, Bronte; Horien, Corey; Ju, Suyeon; Xu, Wanwan; Li, Nancy; Lacadie, Cheryl; Shen, Xilin; Scheinos, Dustin; Constable, Todd; Fredericks, Carolyn	December 22, 2022	Not Determined
36550942	Create Study	Wave-Encoded Model-Based Deep Learning for Highly Accelerated Imaging with Joint Reconstruction.	Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)	Cho, Jaejin; Gagoski, Borjan; Kim, Tae Hyung; Tian, Qiyuan; Frost, Robert; Chatnuntawech, Itthi; Bilgic, Berkin	November 29, 2022	Not Determined
36458845	Create Study	Correction to: Endogenous oscillations time-constrain linguistic segmentation: cycling the garden path.	Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)		January 5, 2023	Not Determined
36435870	Create Study	A cross-cohort replicable and heritable latent dimension linking behaviour to multi-featured brain structure.	Communications biology	Nicolaisen-Sobesky, Eliana; Mihalik, Agoston; Kharabian-Masouleh, Shahrzad; Ferreira, Fabio S; Hoffstaedter, Felix; Schwender, Holger; Maleki Balajoo, Somayeh; Valk, Sofie L; Eickhoff, Simon B; Yeo, B T Thomas; Mourao-Miranda, Janaina; Genon, Sarah	November 26, 2022	Not Determined
36368498	Create Study	Cortical myelin profile variations in healthy aging brain: A T1w/T2w ratio study.	NeuroImage	Sui, Yu Veronica; Masurkar, Arjun V; Rusinek, Henry; Reisberg, Barry; Lazar, Mariana	December 1, 2022	Not Determined
36302824	Create Study	Educational quality may be a closer correlate of cardiometabolic health than educational attainment.	Scientific reports	Cundiff, Jenny M; Lin, Shayne S-H; Faulk, Robert D; McDonough, Ian M	October 27, 2022	Not Determined
35985618	Create Study	Cross-cohort replicability and generalizability of connectivity-based psychometric prediction patterns.	NeuroImage	Wu, Jianxiao; Li, Jingwei; Eickhoff, Simon B; Hoffstaedter, Felix; Hanke, Michael; Yeo, B T Thomas; Genon, Sarah	November 15, 2022	Not Determined
35697132	Create Study	Empirical transmit field bias correction of T1w/T2w myelin maps.	NeuroImage	Glasser, Matthew F; Coalson, Timothy S; Harms, Michael P; Xu, Junqian; Baum, Graham L; Autio, Joonas A; Auerbach, Edward J; Greve, Douglas N; Yacoub, Essa; Van Essen, David C; Bock, Nicholas A; Hayashi, Takuya	September 1, 2022	Not Determined
35475571	Create Study	Methodological evaluation of individual cognitive prediction based on the brain white matter structural connectome.	Human brain mapping	Feng, Guozheng; Wang, Yiwen; Huang, Weijie; Chen, Haojie; Dai, Zhengjia; Ma, Guolin; Li, Xin; Zhang, Zhanjun; Shu, Ni	August 15, 2022	Not Determined
35433118	Create Study	The Impact of Personality Pathology Across Three Generations: Evidence from the St. Louis Personality and Intergenerational Network Study.	Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science	Shields, Allison N; Oltmanns, Thomas F; Boudreaux, Michael J; Paul, Sarah E; Bogdan, Ryan; Tackett, Jennifer L	September 1, 2021	Not Determined
35429627	Create Study	Psychological resilience and neurodegenerative risk: A connectomics-transcriptomics investigation in healthy adolescent and middle-aged females.	NeuroImage	Petrican, Raluca; Fornito, Alex; Jones, Natalie	July 15, 2022	Not Determined
35278806	Create Study	Can bilingualism increase neuroplasticity of language networks in epilepsy?	Epilepsy research	Stasenko, Alena; Schadler, Adam; Kaestner, Erik; Reyes, Anny; Díaz-Santos, Mirella; Połczyńska, Monika; McDonald, Carrie R	May 1, 2022	Not Determined
35240299	Create Study	SDnDTI: Self-supervised deep learning-based denoising for diffusion tensor MRI.	NeuroImage	Tian, Qiyuan; Li, Ziyu; Fan, Qiuyun; Polimeni, Jonathan R; Bilgic, Berkin; Salat, David H; Huang, Susie Y	June 1, 2022	Not Determined
35033950	Create Study	Associations between cognition and polygenic liability to substance involvement in middle childhood: Results from the ABCD study.	Drug and alcohol dependence	Paul, Sarah E; Hatoum, Alexander S; Barch, Deanna M; Thompson, Wesley K; Agrawal, Arpana; Bogdan, Ryan; Johnson, Emma C	March 1, 2022	Not Determined
34642974	Create Study	Single-shell NODDI using dictionary-learner-estimated isotropic volume fraction.	NMR in biomedicine	Faiyaz, Abrar; Doyley, Marvin; Schifitto, Giovanni; Zhong, Jianhui; Uddin, Md Nasir	February 1, 2022	Not Determined
34587005	Create Study	SynthMorph: Learning Contrast-Invariant Registration Without Acquired Images.	IEEE transactions on medical imaging	Hoffmann, Malte; Billot, Benjamin; Greve, Douglas N; Iglesias, Juan Eugenio; Fischl, Bruce; Dalca, Adrian V	March 1, 2022	Not Determined
34582057	Create Study	Identifying individuals with Alzheimer''s disease-like brains based on structural imaging in the Human Connectome Project Aging cohort.	Human brain mapping	Li, Binyin; Jang, Ikbeom; Riphagen, Joost; Almaktoum, Randa; Yochim, Kathryn Morrison; Ances, Beau M; Bookheimer, Susan Y; Salat, David H; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative	December 1, 2021	Not Determined
34508893	Create Study	The Human Connectome Project: A retrospective.	NeuroImage	Elam, Jennifer Stine; Glasser, Matthew F; Harms, Michael P; Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N; Andersson, Jesper L R; Burgess, Gregory C; Curtiss, Sandra W; Oostenveld, Robert; Larson-Prior, Linda J; Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs; Hodge, Michael R; Cler, Eileen A; Marcus, Daniel M; Barch, Deanna M; Yacoub, Essa; Smith, Stephen M; Ugurbil, Kamil; Van Essen, David C	December 1, 2021	Not Determined
34450262	Create Study	Hierarchical modelling of functional brain networks in population and individuals from big fMRI data.	NeuroImage	Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan; Bijsterbosch, Janine D; Gong, Weikang; Jbabdi, Saad; Smith, Stephen M; Harrison, Samuel J; Woolrich, Mark W	November 1, 2021	Not Determined
34421216	Create Study	Rapid head-pose detection for automated slice prescription of fetal-brain MRI.	International journal of imaging systems and technology	Hoffmann, Malte; Turk, Esra Abaci; Gagoski, Borjan; Morgan, Leah; Wighton, Paul; Tisdall, M Dylan; Reuter, Martin; Adalsteinsson, Elfar; Grant, P Ellen; Wald, Lawrence L; van der Kouwe, André J W	September 1, 2021	Not Determined
34287779	Create Study	Brain structure and problematic alcohol use: a test of plausible causation using latent causal variable analysis.	Brain imaging and behavior	Hatoum, Alexander S; Johnson, Emma C; Agrawal, Arpana; Bogdan, Ryan	December 1, 2021	Not Determined
34271214	Create Study	Psychotic-like Experiences and Polygenic Liability in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.	Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging	Karcher, Nicole R; Paul, Sarah E; Johnson, Emma C; Hatoum, Alexander S; Baranger, David A A; Agrawal, Arpana; Thompson, Wesley K; Barch, Deanna M; Bogdan, Ryan	January 1, 2022	Not Determined
34092032	Create Study	Polygenic risk scores for alcohol involvement relate to brain structure in substance-naïve children: Results from the ABCD study.	Genes, brain, and behavior	Hatoum, Alexander S; Johnson, Emma C; Baranger, David A A; Paul, Sarah E; Agrawal, Arpana; Bogdan, Ryan	June 6, 2021	Not Determined
33539118	Create Study	Neuroticism and reward-related ventral striatum activity: Probing vulnerability to stress-related depression.	Journal of abnormal psychology	Bondy, Erin; Baranger, David A A; Balbona, Jared; Sputo, Kendall; Paul, Sarah E; Oltmanns, Thomas F; Bogdan, Ryan	April 1, 2021	Not Determined
33524575	Create Study	Characterizing cerebral hemodynamics across the adult lifespan with arterial spin labeling MRI data from the Human Connectome Project-Aging.	NeuroImage	Juttukonda, Meher R; Li, Binyin; Almaktoum, Randa; Stephens, Kimberly A; Yochim, Kathryn M; Yacoub, Essa; Buckner, Randy L; Salat, David H	April 15, 2021	Not Determined
33406867	Create Study	Heterogeneity of Cerebral White Matter Lesions and Clinical Correlates in Older Adults.	Stroke	Jung, Keun-Hwa; Stephens, Kimberly A; Yochim, Kathryn M; Riphagen, Joost M; Kim, Chan Mi; Buckner, Randy L; Salat, David H	January 1, 2021	Not Determined
33380275	Create Study	Updated demographically adjusted norms for the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-revised and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised in Spanish-speakers from the U.S.-Mexico border region: The NP-NUMBRS project.	The Clinical neuropsychologist	Díaz-Santos, Mirella; Suárez, Paola A; Marquine, María J; Umlauf, Anya; Rivera Mindt, Monica; Artiola I Fortuny, Lidia; Heaton, Robert K; Cherner, Mariana	February 1, 2021	Not Determined
33356892	Create Study	Native Spanish-speaker''s test performance and the effects of Spanish-English bilingualism: results from the neuropsychological norms for the U.S.-Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project.	The Clinical neuropsychologist	Suárez, Paola A; Marquine, María J; Díaz-Santos, Mirella; Gollan, Tamar; Artiola I Fortuny, Lidia; Rivera Mindt, Monica; Heaton, Robert; Cherner, Mariana	February 1, 2021	Not Determined
33236033	Create Study	Genetic Liability to Cannabis Use Disorder and COVID-19 Hospitalization.	medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences	Hatoum, Alexander S; Morrison, Claire L; Winiger, Evan A; Johnson, Emma C; Agrawal, Arpana; Bogdan, Ryan	November 18, 2020	Not Determined
32985352	Create Study	Demographically adjusted norms for the Trail Making Test in native Spanish speakers: Results from the neuropsychological norms for the US-Mexico border region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project.	The Clinical neuropsychologist	Suarez, Paola A; Díaz-Santos, Mirella; Marquine, Maria J; Kamalyan, Lily; Mindt, Monica Rivera; Umlauf, Anya; Heaton, Robert K; Grant, Igor; Cherner, Mariana	February 1, 2021	Not Determined
32871388	Create Study	Prediction of clinical and biomarker conformed Alzheimer''s disease and mild cognitive impairment from multi-feature brain structural MRI using age-correction from a large independent lifespan sample.	NeuroImage. Clinical	Li, Binyin; Zhang, Miao; Riphagen, Joost; Morrison Yochim, Kathryn; Li, Biao; Liu, Jun; Salat, David H; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative	January 1, 2020	Not Determined
32866666	Create Study	The developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) automated resting-state functional processing framework for newborn infants.	NeuroImage	Fitzgibbon, Sean P; Harrison, Samuel J; Jenkinson, Mark; Baxter, Luke; Robinson, Emma C; Bastiani, Matteo; Bozek, Jelena; Karolis, Vyacheslav; Cordero Grande, Lucilio; Price, Anthony N; Hughes, Emer; Makropoulos, Antonios; Passerat-Palmbach, Jonathan; Schuh, Andreas; Gao, Jianliang; Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan; O'Muircheartaigh, Jonathan; Ciarrusta, Judit; O'Keeffe, Camilla; Brandon, Jakki; Arichi, Tomoki; Rueckert, Daniel; Hajnal, Joseph V; Edwards, A David; Smith, Stephen M; Duff, Eugene; Andersson, Jesper	December 1, 2020	Not Determined
32497785	Create Study	A Symmetric Prior for the Regularisation of Elastic Deformations: Improved anatomical plausibility in nonlinear image registration.	NeuroImage	Lange, Frederik J; Ashburner, John; Smith, Stephen M; Andersson, Jesper L R	October 1, 2020	Not Determined
32474754	Create Study	Hemodynamic latency is associated with reduced intelligence across the lifespan: an fMRI DCM study of aging, cerebrovascular integrity, and cognitive ability.	Brain structure & function	Anderson, Ariana E; Diaz-Santos, Mirella; Frei, Spencer; Dang, Bianca H; Kaur, Pashmeen; Lyden, Patrick; Buxton, Richard; Douglas, Pamela K; Bilder, Robert M; Esfandiari, Mahtash; Friston, Karl J; Nookala, Usha; Bookheimer, Susan Y	July 1, 2020	Not Determined
32312691	Create Study	Borderline Personality Traits Are Not Correlated With Brain Structure in Two Large Samples.	Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging	Baranger, David A A; Few, Lauren R; Sheinbein, Daniel H; Agrawal, Arpana; Oltmanns, Thomas F; Knodt, Annchen R; Barch, Deanna M; Hariri, Ahmad R; Bogdan, Ryan	July 1, 2020	Not Determined
32039857	Create Study	Serial Reaction Time Task Performance in Older Adults with Neuropsychologically Defined Mild Cognitive Impairment.	Journal of Alzheimer''s disease : JAD	Hong, Yue; Alvarado, Rachel L; Jog, Amod; Greve, Douglas N; Salat, David H	January 1, 2020	Not Determined
31699293	Create Study	Convergent Evidence for Predispositional Effects of Brain Gray Matter Volume on Alcohol Consumption.	Biological psychiatry	Baranger, David A A; Demers, Catherine H; Elsayed, Nourhan M; Knodt, Annchen R; Radtke, Spenser R; Desmarais, Aline; Few, Lauren R; Agrawal, Arpana; Heath, Andrew C; Barch, Deanna M; Squeglia, Lindsay M; Williamson, Douglas E; Hariri, Ahmad R; Bogdan, Ryan	April 1, 2020	Not Determined
31343240	Create Study	Depressive symptoms precede cognitive impairment in de novo Parkinson''s disease patients: Analysis of the PPMI cohort.	Neuropsychology	Jones, Jacob D; Kurniadi, Natalie E; Kuhn, Taylor P; Szymkowicz, Sarah M; Bunch, Joseph; Rahmani, Elizabeth	November 1, 2019	Not Determined
31099175	Create Study	Genome-wide association study identifies loci associated with liability to alcohol and drug dependence that is associated with variability in reward-related ventral striatum activity in African- and European-Americans.	Genes, brain, and behavior	Wetherill, Leah; Lai, Dongbing; Johnson, Emma C; Anokhin, Andrey; Bauer, Lance; Bucholz, Kathleen K; Dick, Danielle M; Hariri, Ahmad R; Hesselbrock, Victor; Kamarajan, Chella; Kramer, John; Kuperman, Samuel; Meyers, Jacquelyn L; Nurnberger Jr, John I; Schuckit, Marc; Scott, Denise M; Taylor, Robert E; Tischfield, Jay; Porjesz, Bernice; Goate, Alison M; Edenberg, Howard J; Foroud, Tatiana; Bogdan, Ryan; Agrawal, Arpana	July 1, 2019	Not Determined
31090166	Create Study	Genome-wide association studies of alcohol dependence, DSM-IV criterion count and individual criteria.	Genes, brain, and behavior	Lai, Dongbing; Wetherill, Leah; Bertelsen, Sarah; Carey, Caitlin E; Kamarajan, Chella; Kapoor, Manav; Meyers, Jacquelyn L; Anokhin, Andrey P; Bennett, David A; Bucholz, Kathleen K; Chang, Katharine K; De Jager, Philip L; Dick, Danielle M; Hesselbrock, Victor; Kramer, John; Kuperman, Samuel; Nurnberger Jr, John I; Raj, Towfique; Schuckit, Marc; Scott, Denise M; Taylor, Robert E; Tischfield, Jay; Hariri, Ahmad R; Edenberg, Howard J; Agrawal, Arpana; Bogdan, Ryan; Porjesz, Bernice; Goate, Alison M; Foroud, Tatiana	July 1, 2019	Not Determined
30332613	Create Study	The Lifespan Human Connectome Project in Aging: An overview.	NeuroImage	Bookheimer, Susan Y; Salat, David H; Terpstra, Melissa; Ances, Beau M; Barch, Deanna M; Buckner, Randy L; Burgess, Gregory C; Curtiss, Sandra W; Diaz-Santos, Mirella; Elam, Jennifer Stine; Fischl, Bruce; Greve, Douglas N; Hagy, Hannah A; Harms, Michael P; Hatch, Olivia M; Hedden, Trey; Hodge, Cynthia; Japardi, Kevin C; Kuhn, Taylor P; Ly, Timothy K; Smith, Stephen M; Somerville, Leah H; Uğurbil, Kâmil; van der Kouwe, Andre; Van Essen, David; Woods, Roger P; Yacoub, Essa	January 15, 2019	Not Determined
30261308	Create Study	Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: Imaging protocols for the Lifespan Development and Aging projects.	NeuroImage	Harms, Michael P; Somerville, Leah H; Ances, Beau M; Andersson, Jesper; Barch, Deanna M; Bastiani, Matteo; Bookheimer, Susan Y; Brown, Timothy B; Buckner, Randy L; Burgess, Gregory C; Coalson, Timothy S; Chappell, Michael A; Dapretto, Mirella; Douaud, Gwenaëlle; Fischl, Bruce; Glasser, Matthew F; Greve, Douglas N; Hodge, Cynthia; Jamison, Keith W; Jbabdi, Saad; Kandala, Sridhar; Li, Xiufeng; Mair, Ross W; Mangia, Silvia; Marcus, Daniel; Mascali, Daniele; Moeller, Steen; Nichols, Thomas E; Robinson, Emma C; Salat, David H; Smith, Stephen M; Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N; Terpstra, Melissa; Thomas, Kathleen M; Tisdall, M Dylan; Ugurbil, Kamil; van der Kouwe, Andre; Woods, Roger P; Zöllei, Lilla; Van Essen, David C; Yacoub, Essa	December 2018	Not Determined
29852283	Create Study	Automated processing pipeline for neonatal diffusion MRI in the developing Human Connectome Project.	NeuroImage	Bastiani, Matteo; Andersson, Jesper L R; Cordero-Grande, Lucilio; Murgasova, Maria; Hutter, Jana; Price, Anthony N; Makropoulos, Antonios; Fitzgibbon, Sean P; Hughes, Emer; Rueckert, Daniel; Victor, Suresh; Rutherford, Mary; Edwards, A David; Smith, Stephen M; Tournier, Jacques-Donald; Hajnal, Joseph V; Jbabdi, Saad; Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N	January 15, 2019	Not Determined
29579395	Create Study	Polygenic Risk Scores in Clinical Psychology: Bridging Genomic Risk to Individual Differences.	Annual review of clinical psychology	Bogdan, Ryan; Baranger, David A A; Agrawal, Arpana	May 7, 2018	Not Determined
29277648	Create Study	Susceptibility-induced distortion that varies due to motion: Correction in diffusion MR without acquiring additional data.	NeuroImage	Andersson, Jesper L R; Graham, Mark S; Drobnjak, Ivana; Zhang, Hui; Campbell, Jon	May 1, 2018	Not Determined
29112194	Create Study	Genome-wide association study identifies a novel locus for cannabis dependence.	Molecular psychiatry	Agrawal, A; Chou, Y-L; Carey, C E; Baranger, D A A; Zhang, B; Sherva, R; Wetherill, L; Kapoor, M; Wang, J-C; Bertelsen, S; Anokhin, A P; Hesselbrock, V; Kramer, J; Lynskey, M T; Meyers, J L; Nurnberger, J I; Rice, J P; Tischfield, J; Bierut, L J; Degenhardt, L; Farrer, L A; Gelernter, J; Hariri, A R; Heath, A C; Kranzler, H R; Madden, P A F; Martin, N G; Montgomery, G W; Porjesz, B; Wang, T; Whitfield, J B; Edenberg, H J; Foroud, T; Goate, A M; Bogdan, R; Nelson, E C	May 1, 2018	Not Determined
28749606	Create Study	Perceived stress is associated with increased rostral middle frontal gyrus cortical thickness: a family-based and discordant-sibling investigation.	Genes, brain, and behavior	Michalski, L J; Demers, C H; Baranger, D A A; Barch, D M; Harms, M P; Burgess, G C; Bogdan, R	November 1, 2017	Not Determined
28739213	Create Study	Association Between Substance Use Disorder and Polygenic Liability to Schizophrenia.	Biological psychiatry	Hartz, Sarah M; Horton, Amy C; Oehlert, Mary; Carey, Caitlin E; Agrawal, Arpana; Bogdan, Ryan; Chen, Li-Shiun; Hancock, Dana B; Johnson, Eric O; Pato, Carlos N; Pato, Michele T; Rice, John P; Bierut, Laura J	November 15, 2017	Not Determined
28645098	Create Study	The behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder reveal a robust effect for interpersonal traits.	Behaviour research and therapy	Rodebaugh, Thomas L; Tonge, Natasha A; Weisman, Jaclyn S; Lim, Michelle H; Fernandez, Katya C; Bogdan, Ryan	August 1, 2017	Not Determined
28379578	Create Study	An earlier time of scan is associated with greater threat-related amygdala reactivity.	Social cognitive and affective neuroscience	Baranger, David A A; Margolis, Seth; Hariri, Ahmad R; Bogdan, Ryan	August 1, 2017	Not Determined
28283186	Create Study	Imaging Genetics and Genomics in Psychiatry: A Critical Review of Progress and Potential.	Biological psychiatry	Bogdan, Ryan; Salmeron, Betty Jo; Carey, Caitlin E; Agrawal, Arpana; Calhoun, Vince D; Garavan, Hugh; Hariri, Ahmad R; Heinz, Andreas; Hill, Matthew N; Holmes, Andrew; Kalin, Ned H; Goldman, David	August 1, 2017	Not Determined

helpcenter.collection.publications-tab

Collection - Publications

The number of Publications is displayed in parentheses next to the tab name. Clicking on any of the Publication Titles will open the Publication in a new internet browsing tab.

Collection Owners, Program Officers, and users with Submission or Administrative Privileges for the Collection may mark a publication as either Relevant or Not Relevant in the Status column.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I determine if a publication is relevant?

Publications are considered relevant to a collection when the data shared is directly related to the project or collection.
Where does the NDA get the publications?

PubMed, an online library containing journals, articles, and medical research. Sponsored by NiH and National Library of Medicine (NLM).

Glossary

Create Study

A link to the Create an NDA Study page that can be clicked to start creating an NDA Study with information such as the title, journal and authors automatically populated.
Not Determined Publication

Indicates that the publication has not yet been reviewed and/or marked as Relevant or Not Relevant so it has not been determined whether an NDA Study is expected.
Not Relevant Publication

A publication that is not based on data related to the aims of the grant/project associated with the Collection or not based on any data such as a review article and, therefore, an NDA Study is not expected to be created.
PubMed

PubMed provides citation information for biomedical and life sciences publications and is managed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine.
PubMed ID

The PUBMed ID is the unique ID number for the publication as recorded in the PubMed database.
Relevant Publication

A publication that is based on data related to the aims of the grant/project associated with the Collection and, therefore, an NDA Study is expected to be created.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Data Expected List: Mandatory Data Structures

These data structures are mandatory for your NDA Collection. Please update the Targeted Enrollment number to accurately represent the number of subjects you expect to submit for the entire study.

Data Expected	Targeted Enrollment	Initial Submission	Subjects Submitted	Initial Share	Subjects Shared	Status
Research Subject and Pedigree	689	03/15/2019	1,215	08/31/2020	725	Approved

You can use "Add New Data Expected" to add exsiting structures and create your project's list. However, this is also the method you can use to request new structures be created for your project. When adding the Data Expected item, if the structure already exists you can locate it and specify your dates and enrollment. To add a new structure and request it be defined in the Data Dictionary, select Upload Definition and attach the definition or material needed to create it, including manual, codebooks, forms, etc. If you have multiple files, please upload a zipped archive containing them all.

Expected dates should be selected based on the standard Data Sharing Regimen and are restricted to within date ranges based on the project start and end dates.

Data Expected List: Data Structures per Research Aims

These data structures are specific to your research aims and should list all data structures in which data will be collected and submitted for this NDA Collection. Please update the Targeted Enrollment number to accurately represent the number of subjects you expect to submit for the entire study.

Data Expected	Targeted Enrollment	Initial Submission	Subjects Submitted	Initial Share	Subjects Shared	Status
Penn Emotion Recognition Task-40	1,200	02/02/2020	1,163	02/02/2021	723	Approved
Medical History	1,200	02/02/2020	1,209	02/02/2021	722	Approved
NEO Personality Inventory	1,000	08/05/2019	1,215	11/01/2019	725	Approved
Vital Signs Assessment	1,200	02/02/2020	1,215	02/02/2021	725	Approved
Processed MRI Data	689	04/19/2019	725	08/31/2020	725	Approved
Physical Exam	689	04/19/2019	1,215	08/31/2020	725	Approved
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index	1,200	02/02/2020	1,215	02/02/2021	725	Approved
Medications and Treatments Form	1,200	02/02/2020	1,215	02/02/2021	725	Approved
Trail Making Test (Child and Adult)	1,200	02/02/2020	1,210	02/02/2021	724	Approved
Auditory Verbal Learning Task	1,000	09/16/2019	1,206	11/01/2019	720	Approved
International Physical Activity Questionnaire	1,200	02/02/2020	1,215	02/02/2021	725	Approved
Adult Self Report	1,200	02/02/2020	1,210	02/02/2021	720	Approved
Imaging (Structural, fMRI, DTI, PET, microscopy)	689	04/19/2019	725	08/31/2020	725	Approved
Delay Discounting Task	1,200	02/02/2020	1,160	02/02/2021	719	Approved
Blood Sample Collection	1,200	02/02/2020	1,211	02/02/2021	725	Approved
Montreal Cognitive Assessment	1,000	08/05/2019	1,215	11/01/2019	725	Approved
INTERNATIONAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury	1,000	08/05/2019	1,215	11/01/2019	725	Approved
Semi-Structured Assessment For the Genetics of Alcoholism	1,000	08/05/2019	719	11/01/2019	719	Approved
Scanner Debriefing Interview	1,200	02/02/2020	1,196	02/02/2021	715	Approved
Lawton & Brody Activities of Daily Living	1,000	08/19/2019	654	11/01/2019	339	Approved
The Life Events Scale	1,000	08/05/2019	1,212	11/01/2019	723	Approved
Language Experience Proficiency Questionnaire	1,200	02/02/2020	1,215	02/02/2021	725	Approved
Blood Samples and Labs	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
Dental Work Questionnaire	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
OLDER ADULT SELF-REPORT FOR AGES 60 AND ABOVE	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
FaceName V2 HCPA integrated scanner and recall structure	1,000	03/31/2020	0	07/31/2020	0	Approved
Menopause/STRAW10+	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
Caffeine Nicotine Alcohol and Other Drugs	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
UPennCNP Emotion and Delayed Discount	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
HCPA_psqi	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
CurrentMedications	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved
Participant Satisfaction Survey	1,000	08/05/2019	0	11/01/2019	0	Approved

Structure not yet defined

No Status history for this Data Expected has been recorded yet

helpcenter.collection.data-expected-tab

Collection - Data Expected

The Data Expected tab displays the list of all data that NDA expects to receive in association with the Collection as defined by the contributing researcher, as well as the dates for the expected initial upload of the data, and when it is first expected to be shared, or with the research community. Above the primary table of Data Expected, any publications determined to be relevant to the data within the Collection are also displayed - members of the contributing research group can use these to define NDA Studies, connecting those papers to underlying data in NDA.

The tab is used both as a reference for those accessing shared data, providing information on what is expected and when it will be shared, and as the primary tracking mechanism for contributing projects. It is used by both contributing primary researchers, secondary researchers, and NIH Program and Grants Management staff.

Contributing researchers just getting started on their project will need to define this list by adding all of the items they are collecting under their grant and setting their schedule according to the NDA Data Sharing Regimen. If you fall into this category, you can begin by clicking "Add New Data Expected" and selecting which data structures you will be using, saving the page after each change, or requesting new structures by adding and naming a new item, providing any materials NDA Data Dictionary Curators can use to help define your structure. For more information see the tutorial on creating Data Expected.

If you are a contributing researcher creating this list for the first time, or making changes to the list as your project progress, please note the following:

Although items you add to the list and changes you make are displayed, they are not committed to the system until you Save the entire page using the "Save" button at the bottom of your screen. Please Save after every change to ensure none of your work is lost.
If you attempt to add a new structure, the title you provide must be unique - if another structure exists with the same name your change will fail.
Adding a new structure to this list is the only way to request the creation of a new Data Dictionary definition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an NDA Data Structure?

An NDA Data Structure is comprised of multiple Data Elements to make up an electronic definition of an assessment, measure, questionnaire, etc will have a corresponding Data Structure.
What is the NDA Data Dictionary?

The NDA Data Dictionary is comprised of electronic definitions known as Data Structures.

Glossary

Analyzed Data

Data specific to the primary aims of the research being conducted (e.g. outcome measures, other dependent variables, observations, laboratory results, analyzed images, volumetric data, etc.) including processed images.
Data Item

Items listed on the Data Expected list in the Collection which may be an individual and discrete Data Structure, Data Structure Category, or Data Structure Group.
Data Structure

A defined organization and group of Data Elements to represent an electronic definition of a measure, assessment, questionnaire, or collection of data points. Data structures that have been defined in the NDA Data Dictionary are available at https://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=data-structure
Data Structure Category

An NDA term describing the affiliation of a Data Structure to a Category, which may be disease/disorder or diagnosis related (Depression, ADHD, Psychosis), specific to data type (MRI, eye tracking, omics), or type of data (physical exam, IQ).
Data Structure Group

A Data Item listed on the Data Expected tab of a Collection that indicates a group of Data Structures (e.g., ADOS or SCID) for which data may be submitted instead of a specific Data Structure identified by version, module, edition, etc. For example, the ADOS Data Structure Category includes every ADOS Data Structure such as ADOS Module 1, ADOS Module 2, ADOS Module 1 - 2nd Edition, etc. The SCID Data Structure Group includes every SCID Data Structure such as SCID Mania, SCID V Mania, SCID PTSD, SCID-V Diagnosis, and more.
Evaluated Data

A new Data Structure category, Evaluated Data is analyzed data resulting from the use of computational pipelines in the Cloud and can be uploaded directly back to a miNDAR database. Evaluated Data is expected to be listed as a Data Item in the Collection's Data Expected Tab.
Imaging Data

Imaging+ is an NDA term which encompasses all imaging related data including, but not limited to, images (DTI, MRI, PET, Structural, Spectroscopy, etc.) as well as neurosignal data (EEG, fMRI, MEG, EGG, eye tracking, etc.) and Evaluated Data.
Initial Share Date

Initial Submission and Initial Share dates should be populated according to the NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Any modifications to these will go through the approval processes outlined above. Data will be shared with authorized users upon publication (via an NDA Study) or 1-2 years after the grant end date specified on the first Notice of Award, as defined in the applicable Data Sharing Terms and Conditions.
Initial Submission Date

Initial Submission and Initial Share dates should be populated according to these NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Any modifications to these will go through the approval processes outlined above. Data for all subjects is not expected on the Initial Submission Date and modifications may be made as necessary based on the project's conduct.
Research Subject and Pedigree

An NDA created Data Structure used to convey basic information about the subject such as demographics, pedigree (links family GUIDs), diagnosis/phenotype, and sample location that are critical to allow for easier querying of shared data.
Submission Cycle

The NDA has two Submission Cycles per year - January 15 and July 15.
Submission Exemption

An interface to notify NDA that data may not be submitted during the upcoming/current submission cycle.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Associated Studies

Studies that have been defined using data from a Collection are important criteria to determine the value of data shared. The number of subjects column displays the counts from this Collection that are included in a Study, out of the total number of subjects in that study. The Data Use column represents whether or not the study is a primary analysis of the data or a secondary analysis. State indicates whether the study is private or shared with the research community.

Study NameFilter by Study Name	AbstractFilter by Abstract	Collection/Study SubjectsFilter by Collection/Study Subjects	Data UsageFilter by Data Usage	StateFilter by State
Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Neuroinflammation Metrics in Adolescents	Human obesity is related to alterations in brain structure and function. Rodent models of obesity show that diet-induced obesity causes neuroinflammation and impairment in learning and memory. In humans, non-invasive measurement of putative neuroinflammation is accomplished with diffusion-based magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. We have shown that, relative to normal-weight, obese adults have greater putative neuroinflammation, including indicators of cellularity and vasogenic edema, using diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) to model anisotropic and isotropic water diffusion in white matter tracts and regions of interest including hippocampus. Characterization of relationships between adiposity and brain structure and function in adolescents may provide insight into mechanisms underlying development of chronic overfeeding and obesity. Recently, Rapuano et al. (2020) used diffusion-based restricted spectrum imaging (RSI) to quantify putative neuroinflammation in reward-related brain regions in a large sample of 9 and 10 year old children enrolled in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) multi-site study and found that greater cellular density in the nucleus accumbens related to higher body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference at baseline and 1 year after MR imaging. We compared DBSI-measured putative neuroinflammation to those of RSI by selecting a sample of 9 and 10 year old children enrolled in the ABCD study representing a wide range of BMI categories (n=200 normal-weight; 50 overweight; 50 obese) and based on effect sizes and inclusion and exclusion criteria in the Rapuano et al. (2020) study. We hypothesize that greater neuroinflammation, as measured by DBSI, in white matter tracts and reward-related brain regions will relate to higher BMI and waist circumference at baseline and 1 year after MR imaging. Findings from the current study will provide insight into whether two different diffusion-based models yield convergent evidence regarding neuroinflammation and its relationship to adiposity in adolescents.	725/13751	Secondary Analysis	Private
A cross-cohort replicable and heritable latent dimension linking behaviour to multi-featured brain structure	Identifying the complex association between inter-individual variability in brain structure and in behaviour is challenging, requiring large cohorts, multivariate methods, out-of-sample validation and, ideally, out-of-cohort replication. Moreover, the influence of nature vs nurture on such associations could be better understood through heritability analysis. Here, we analysed associations between brain structure and behaviour using regularized canonical correlation analysis and a recently proposed machine learning framework that tests the generalisability of such associations. We linked behaviour (spanning cognition, emotion, and alertness) and multi-featured brain structure (grey matter volume, cortical thickness, and surface area). The replicability of such brain-behaviour associations was assessed in two large and independent cohorts. The load of genetic factors on these latent dimensions was analysed with heritability and genetic correlation. We found one heritable and replicable latent dimension. This latent dimension was positively associated with cognitive-control/executive-functions and positive affect, and negatively associated with impulsivity and negative affect. This behavioural profile was related to brain structural variability in areas typically associated with higher cognitive functions, as well as with areas typically associated with sensorimotor functions. These results revealed a major axis of interindividual variability in behaviour that links to a whole-brain structural pattern.	725/725	Primary Analysis	Shared
Cross-cohort replicability and generalizability of connectivity-based psychometric prediction patterns	An increasing number of studies have investigated the relationships between inter-individual variability in brain regions’ connectivity and behavioral phenotypes, making use of large population neuroimaging datasets. However, the replicability of brain-behavior associations identified by these approaches remains an open question. In this study, we examined the cross-dataset replicability of brain-behavior association patterns for fluid cognition and openness predictions using a previously developed region-wise approach, as well as using a standard whole-brain approach. Overall, we found moderate similarity in patterns for fluid cognition predictions across cohorts, especially in the Human Connectome Project Young Adult, Human Connectome Project Aging, and Enhanced Nathan Kline Institute Rockland Sample cohorts, but low similarity in patterns for openness predictions. In addition, we assessed the generalizability of prediction models in cross-dataset predictions, by training the model in one dataset and testing in another. Making use of the region-wise prediction approach, we showed that first, a moderate extent of generalizability could be achieved with fluid cognition prediction, and that, second, a set of common brain regions related to fluid cognition across cohorts could be identified. Nevertheless, the moderate replicability and generalizability could only be achieved in specific contexts. Thus, we argue that replicability and generalizability in connectivity-based prediction remain limited and deserve greater attention in future studies.	725/725	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Human Connectome Project-Aging (HCP-A) Release 2.0	The 2.0 release of data from the Human Connectome Project in Aging (healthy participants, ages 36-100+) includes visit 1 (V1) preprocessed structural and functional imaging data, unprocessed V1 imaging data for all modalities (structural, high-res hippocampal T2, resting state fMRI, task fMRI, diffusion, and ASL), and non-imaging demographic and behavioral assessment data for 725 participants. For details of all the measures included in this release and access instructions see the Lifespan HCP-Aging Release 2.0 documentation link below.	725/725	Primary Analysis	Shared
No Associations between Cerebral Gray Matter Asymmetries and Midsagittal Callosal Area	Background: Structural hemispheric asymmetries are consistently detected in the brain at the population level, but little research has investigated the relationship between the direction and magnitude of such asymmetries and the morphology of the corpus callosum, the brain’s major inter-hemispheric commissure. More pronounced asymmetry has been proposed to correlate with a) a thinner corpus callosum as intra-hemispheric networks predominate; and/or b) a thicker corpus callosum as disparate intra-hemispheric are integrated across the whole brain; and/or c) a thicker corpus callosum as the predominating hemisphere drives inhibition in homotopic regions of the non-dominant hemisphere. To shed some light on these proposed associations, we investigated the relationship between cerebral gray matter asymmetry and midsagittal callosal area in a large sample of 725 healthy older adults. Methods: T1-weighted magnetic resonance images for 725 participants from the HCP Aging project were obtained from the NIMH Data Archive (nda.nih.gov) and analyzed using Matlab (The MathWorks, Natick, MA) and the CAT12 toolbox (Gaser et al., 2022). Specifically, all images were rigid-body realigned to MNI space and bias corrected, and the hemispheric gray matter volume was calculated as the sum of cortical and subcortical gray matter volumes using the ISBR atlas (www.nitrc.org/projects/ibsr) in CAT12. Subsequently, the corpus callosum was manually outlined at the midsagittal slice and the total callosal area as well as the areas of callosal subregions according to the Witelson scheme were calculated. In parallel, hemispheric gray matter asymmetry was quantified using the asymmetry index, which was calculated as AI = (right-left)/(0.5x(right+left)). Associations between hemispheric gray matter asymmetry and midsagittal callosal (sub)area were then assessed using a MANCOVA with the callosal areas as the dependent variables, the asymmetry index as the independent variable, and age, sex, handedness as well as total intracranial volume as covariates. Results: Neither global nor regional callosal measures demonstrated any significant relationship with either relative or absolute hemispheric grey matter asymmetry. Conclusion: Our results are in agreement with one previous study which failed to detect a significant effect between the degree of atypical hemispheric asymmetry and midsagittal callosal area (Thoma et al., 2002), but in disagreement with another previous study which detected a significant negative relationship between absolute hemispheric asymmetry and midsagittal callosal area (Dorion et al., 2000). However, the latter study rather used a measurement for whole hemispheric asymmetry and was not focused on gray matter, and both samples were more than 20 times smaller than the current sample. Overall the current findings suggest that there might not be a clear link between hemispheric gray matter asymmetry and the size of the corpus callosum. References: Dorion, A. A., Chantôme, M., Hasboun, D., Zouaoui, A., Marsault, C., Capron, C., & Duyme, M. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetry and corpus callosum morphometry: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience research, 36(1), 9-13. Gaser, C., Dahnke, R., Thompson, P. M., Kurth, F., & Luders, E. (2022). CAT – A Computational Anatomy Toolbox for the Analysis of Structural MRI Data. bioRxiv, 2022.06.11.495736. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.11.495736 Thoma, R. J., Yeo, R. A., Gangestad, S. W., Lewine, J. D., & Davis, J. T. (2002). Fluctuating asymmetry and the human brain. Laterality, 7(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500143000122	725/725	Secondary Analysis	Private
Physical Fitness, Cognition, and Structural Network Efficiency of Brain Connections Across the Lifespan	Inadequate levels of exercise is one of the most potent modifiable risk factors for preventing cognitive decline and dementia as we age. Meanwhile, network science-based measures of structural brain network global and local efficiency show promise as robust biomarkers of aging, cognitive decline, and pathological disease progression. Despite this, little to no work has established how maintaining physical activity (PA) and physical fitness might relate to cognition and network efficiency measures across the lifespan. Therefore the purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between (1) PA and fitness and cognition, (2) fitness and network efficiency, and (3) how network efficiency measures relate to cognition. To accomplish this, we analyzed a large cross-sectional data set (n=720; 36-100 years) from the aging human connectome project, which included the Trail Making Task (TMT) A and B, a measure of fitness (2-minute walk test), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), and high-resolution diffusion imaging data. Our analysis consisted of employing multiple linear regression while controlling for age, sex, and education. Age was associated with lower global and local brain network efficiency and poorer Trail A & B performance. Meanwhile, fitness, but not physical activity, was related to better Trail A and B performance and fitness, and was positively associated with local and global brain efficiency. Finally, local efficiency was related to better TMT B performance and partially mediated the relationship between fitness and TMT B performance. These results indicate aging may be associated with a shift towards less efficient local and global neural networks and that maintaining physical fitness might protect against age-related cognitive performance deterioration by bolstering structural network efficiency.	725/725	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Transfer learning for cognitive reserve quantification	Cognitive reserve (CR) has been introduced to explain individual differences in susceptibility to cognitive or functional impairment in the presence of age or pathology. We developed a deep learning model to quantify the CR as residual variance in memory performance using the Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI) data from a lifespan healthy cohort. The generalizability of the sMRI-based deep learning model was tested in two independent healthy and Alzheimer's cohorts using transfer learning framework. Structural MRIs were collected from three cohorts: 495 healthy adults (age: 20-80) from RANN, 620 healthy adults (age: 36-100) from lifespan Human Connectome Project Aging (HCPA), and 941 adults (age: 55-92) from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Region of interest (ROI)-specific cortical thickness and volume measures were extracted using the Desikan-Killiany Atlas. CR was quantified by residuals which subtract the predicted memory from the true memory. Cascade neural network (CNN) models were used to train RANN dataset for memory prediction. Transfer learning was applied to transfer the T1 imaging-based model from source domain (RANN) to the target domains (HCPA or ADNI). The CNN model trained on the RANN dataset exhibited strong linear correlation between true and predicted memory based on the T1 cortical thickness and volume predictors. In addition, the model generated from healthy lifespan data (RANN) was able to generalize to an independent healthy lifespan data (HCPA) and older demented participants (ADNI) across different scanner types. The estimated CR was correlated with CR proxies such education and IQ across all three datasets. The current findings suggest that the transfer learning approach is an effective way to generalize the residual-based CR estimation. It is applicable to various diseases and may flexibly incorporate different imaging modalities such as fMRI and PET, making it a promising tool for scientific and clinical purposes.	725/725	Secondary Analysis	Private
Metabolism modulates network synchrony in the aging brain	Brain aging is associated with hypometabolism and global changes in functional connectivity. Using functional MRI (fMRI), we show that network synchrony, a collective property of brain activity, decreases with age. Applying quantitative methods from statistical physics, we provide a generative (Ising) model for these changes as a function of the average communication strength between brain regions. We ﬁnd that older brains are closer to a critical point of this communication strength, in which even small changes in metabolism lead to abrupt changes in network synchrony. Finally, by experimentally modulating metabolic activity in younger adults, we show how metabolism alone—independent of other changes associated with aging—can provide a plausible candidate mechanism for marked reorganization of brain network topology.	719/719	Secondary Analysis	Shared
The interaction between age and sleep quality impacts cognition	Background: The association between sleep quality and cognition is widely established but the role of the aging process on this relationship is largely unknown. Purpose: To examine how age impacts the sleep-cognition relationship and determine critical age ranges when sleep is most strongly associated with cognition. This investigation could help identify individuals at risk for sleep-related cognitive impairment. Methods: Sample included 711 individuals (59.66 ± 14.91, 55.7 % female) who were assessed for sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and cognition as part of the Human Connectome Project Aging (HCP-A). Results: There was a significant interaction term between the PSQI and non-linear age term (age2) on Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) (p = 0.02) and NIH Toolbox (TB) crystallized cognition (p = 0.02), with critical age ranges at ages 50-75 for TMT-B and ages 66-70 for crystallized cognition. Conclusions: The relationship between sleep quality and cognitive performance may be modified by age. Furthermore, middle-age to early older adulthood may be the most vulnerable to sleep-related cognitive impairment.	712/712	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Human Connectome Project-Aging (HCP-A) Release 1.0	Initial release of data from the Human Connectome Project in Aging (ages 35-100+). Release includes basic demographic data (sex, age, race/ethnicity, handedness) and unprocessed imaging data for all modalities (structural, high-res hippocampal T2, resting state fMRI, task fMRI, diffusion, and ASL) for 689 subjects and preprocessed structural imaging data for 128 subjects. Full release documentation available at: https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-lifespan-aging/documentation	689/689	Primary Analysis	Shared
Educational quality may be a closer correlate of cardiometabolic health than educational attainment	Educational quality may be a closer correlate of physical health than more commonly used measures of educational attainment (e.g., years in school). We examined whether a widely-used performance-based measure of educational quality is more closely associated with cardiometabolic health than educational attainment (highest level of education completed), and whether perceived control (smaller sample only), executive functioning (both samples), and health literacy (smaller sample only) link educational quality to cardiometabolic health. In two samples (N=98 and N=586) collected from different regions of the US, educational quality was associated with cardiometabolic health above and beyond educational attainment, other demographic factors (age, ethnoracial category, sex), and fluid intelligence. Counter to expectations, neither perceived control, executive function, nor health literacy significantly mediated the association between educational quality and cardiometabolic health. Findings add to the growing literature suggesting that current operationalizations of the construct of education likely underestimate the association between education and multiple forms of health. To the extent that educational programs may have been overlooked based on the apparent size of associations with outcomes, such actions may have been premature.	586/586	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Intermediately Synchronised Brain States optimise trade-off between Subject Identifiability and Predictive Capacity	Functional connectivity (FC) refers to the statistical dependencies between activity of distinct brain areas. To study temporal fluctuations in FC within the duration of a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning session, researchers have proposed the computation of an edge time series (ETS) and their derivatives. Evidence suggests that FC is driven by a few time points of high-amplitude co- fluctuation (HACF) in the ETS, which may also contribute disproportionately to interindividual differences. However, it remains unclear to what degree different time points actually contribute to brain-behaviour associations. Here, we systematically evaluate this question by assessing the predictive utility of FC estimates at different levels of co-fluctuation using machine learning (ML) approaches. We demonstrate that time points of lower and intermediate co-fluctuation levels provide overall highest subject specificity as well as highest predictive capacity of individual-level phenotypes.	558/558	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Psychological Resilience and Neurodegenerative Risk: A Connectomics-Transcriptomics Investigation in Healthy Adolescent and Middle-Aged Females	Adverse life events can inflict substantial long-term damage, which, paradoxically, has been posited to stem from initially adaptative responses to the challenges encountered in one’s environment. Thus, identification of the mechanisms linking resilience against recent stressors to longer-term psychological vulnerability is key to understanding optimal functioning across multiple timescales. To address this issue, our study tested the relevance of neuro-reproductive maturation and senescence, respectively, to both resilience and longer-term risk for pathologies characterised by accelerated brain aging, specifically, Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Graph theoretical and partial least squares analyses were conducted on multimodal imaging, reported biological aging and recent adverse experience data from the Lifespan Human Connectome Project (HCP). Availability of reproductive maturation/senescence measures restricted our investigation to adolescent (N =178) and middle-aged (N=146) females. Psychological resilience was linked to age-specific brain senescence patterns suggestive of precocious functional development of somatomotor and control-relevant networks (adolescence) and earlier aging of default mode and salience/ventral attention systems (middle adulthood). Biological aging showed complementary associations with the neural patterns relevant to resilience in adolescence (positive relationship) versus middle-age (negative relationship). Transcriptomic and expression quantitative trait locus data analyses linked the neural aging patterns correlated with psychological resilience in middle adulthood to gene expression patterns suggestive of increased AD risk. Our results imply a partially antagonistic relationship between resilience against proximal stressors and longer-term psychological adjustment in later life. They thus underscore the importance of fine-tuning extant views on successful coping by considering the multiple timescales across which age-specific processes may unfold.	146/324	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Jointly Estimating Parametric Maps of Multiple Diffusion Models from Undersampled Q-Space Data: A Comparison of Three Deep Learning Approaches	Objective: While beyond diffusion tensor imaging (b-DTI) techniques have been found valuable in many studies, their clinical availability have been hampered partly due to their long scan times. Moreover, each b-DTI model can only extract a few relevant microstructural features. Therefore, using multiple diffusion models helps to better understand the brain microstructure, which requires multiple expensive model-fitting. In this work, we compare deep learning (DL) approaches to jointly estimate parametric maps of multiple diffusion models from highly undersampled q-space data. Methods: We implement three DL approaches to jointly estimate parametric maps of DTI, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), and multi-compartment spherical mean technique (SMT). A per-voxel q-space deep learning (1D-qDL), a per-slice convolutional neural network (2D-CNN), and a 3D-patch based microstructure estimation with sparse coding using a separable dictionary (MESC-SD) networks are considered. The networks are trained using the Human Connectome Project in Aging (HCP-A) database and are tested using both the HCP-A database and a locally acquired stroke patient dataset. Results: The estimated diffusion maps are compared against target maps derived from fully sampled q-space data in different regions in brain. Our observations shows that accuracy of estimated maps depend on the q-space undersampling pattern, the selected network architecture, and the region and the parametric map of interest. The smallest errors are observed for the MESC-SD network architecture.	117/117	Secondary Analysis	Private
In humans, striato-pallido-thalamic projections are largely segregated by their origin in either the matrix or striosome compartments	Cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loops (CSTCs) are a fundamental organizing unit in the mammalian brain. CSTCs process limbic, associative, and sensorimotor information in largely segregated but interacting networks. The striatal limb of CTSC loops passes through the striatal compartments, striosome (aka patch) and matrix, twin pools of medium spiny neurons (MSNs) that have distinct embryologic origins, cortical and subcortical structural connectivity, susceptibility to injuries, and roles in animal behavior and human diseases. Striatal dopamine modulates basal activity in striosome and matrix in opposite directions, and striosomes alone project directly to nigral dopaminergic neurons. If CSTC projections favor one compartment, this segregation may be an anatomical basis for regulating discrete functions. We recently demonstrated that differential structural connectivity, as measured by probabilistic diffusion tractography, can distinguish striosome-like and matrix-like compartments in the living human striatum. We used this technique to assess compartment-level biases in the striato-pallido-thalamic limb of CSTCs in 221 healthy adults. Streamlines originating in striosome-like and matrix-like voxels diverge at the levels of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) and the thalamic nuclei. Compartment-specific streamlines were anatomically segregated at the level of the GPi: striosome connectivity was significantly more rostral, ventral, and lateral. Streamlines that originated in matrix-like voxels were 5.7-fold more likely to reach the GPi, recapitulating abundance measures in animal tract-tracing studies. Twenty thalamic nuclei met criteria for quantification: striosome-like connectivity dominated in nine nuclei; matrix-like connectivity dominated in eight nuclei; three nuclei had no significant bias. For 18 of 20 thalamic nuclei, matrix-like connectivity was lateralized (left>right hemisphere), independent of whether the nucleus was matrix-biased, striosome-biased, or neutral. These biases in structural connectivity suggest that routing CSTC loops through striosome or matrix is a fundamental mechanism for organizing and regulating behavior. Moreover, compartment-specific characterization may improve localization of striatal, pallidal, and thalamic pathologies in humans.	69/98	Secondary Analysis	Private

* Data not on individual level

helpcenter.collection.associated-studies-tab

Collection - Associated Studies

Clicking on the Study Title will open the study details in a new internet browser tab. The Abstract is available for viewing, providing the background explanation of the study, as provided by the Collection Owner.

Primary v. Secondary Analysis: The Data Usage column will have one of these two choices. An associated study that is listed as being used for Primary Analysis indicates at least some and potentially all of the data used was originally collected by the creator of the NDA Study. Secondary Analysis indicates the Study owner was not involved in the collection of data, and may be used as supporting data.

Private v. Shared State: Studies that remain private indicate the associated study is only available to users who are able to access the collection. A shared study is accessible to the general public.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I associate a study to my collection?

Studies are associated to the Collection automatically when the data is defined in the Study.

Glossary

Associated Studies Tab

A tab in a Collection that lists the NDA Studies that have been created using data from that Collection including both Primary and Secondary Analysis NDA Studies.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Edit

Description
Value Range
Notes
Data Structures with shared data

Choose File:	Select File
File Type:
Description:

Exemption Type*
From Date*
To Date*
Reason*	Characters Remaining:

New Password:
Repeat New Password:

Switch to username*