NIMH Data Archive - Data

Genomics

Neuroimaging

Phenotype¹

New Trial
Clinical Trial

¹ Numbers reported are subjects by age

New Project
Grant/Project Number

Format should be in the following format: Activity Code, Institute Abbreviation, and Serial Number. Grant Type, Support Year, and Suffix should be excluded. For example, grant 1R01MH123456-01A1 should be entered R01MH123456

Collection - Use Existing Experiment

To associate an experiment to the current collection, just select an axperiment from the table below then click the associate experiment button to persist your changes (saving the collection is not required). Note that once an experiment has been associated to two or more collections, the experiment will not longer be editable.

The table search feature is case insensitive and targets the experiment id, experiment name and experiment type columns. The experiment id is searched only when the search term entered is a number, and filtered using a startsWith comparison. When the search term is not numeric the experiment name is used to filter the results.

Select	Experiment Id	Experiment Name	Experiment Type	Created On

24	HI-NGS_R1	Omics	02/16/2011
475	MB1-10 (CHOP)	Omics	06/07/2016
490	Illumina Infinium PsychArray BeadChip Assay	Omics	07/07/2016
501	PharmacoBOLD Resting State	fMRI	07/27/2016
506	PVPREF	Omics	08/05/2016
509	ABC-CT Resting v2	EEG	08/18/2016
13	Comparison of FI expression in Autistic and Neurotypical Homo Sapiens	Omics	12/28/2010
18	AGRE/Broad Affymetrix 5.0 Genotype Experiment	Omics	01/06/2011
22	Stitching PCR Sequencing	Omics	02/14/2011
26	ASD_Methylation	Omics	03/01/2011
29	Microarray family 03 (father, mother, sibling)	Omics	03/24/2011
37	Standard paired-end sequencing of BCRs	Omics	04/19/2011
38	Illumina Mate-Pair BCR sequencing	Omics	04/19/2011
39	Custom Jumping Libraries	Omics	04/19/2011
40	Custom CapBP	Omics	04/19/2011
41	Immunofluorescence	Omics	05/11/2011
43	Autism brain sample genotyping, Illumina	Omics	05/16/2011
47	ARRA Autism Sequencing Collaboration at Baylor. SOLiD 4 System	Omics	08/01/2011
53	AGRE Omni1-quad	Omics	10/11/2011
59	AGP genotyping	Omics	04/03/2012
60	Ultradeep 454 sequencing of synaptic genes from postmortem cerebella of individuals with ASD and neurotypical controls	Omics	06/23/2012
63	Microemulsion PCR and Targeted Resequencing for Variant Detection in ASD	Omics	07/20/2012
76	Whole Genome Sequencing in Autism Families	Omics	01/03/2013
519	Resting	fMRI	11/08/2016
90	Genotyped IAN Samples	Omics	07/09/2013
91	NJLAGS Axiom Genotyping Array	Omics	07/16/2013
93	AGP genotyping (CNV)	Omics	09/06/2013
106	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 2	EEG	11/07/2013
107	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 3	EEG	11/07/2013
108	Longitudinal Sleep Study. AURA 200	EEG	11/07/2013
105	Longitudinal Sleep Study. H20 200. Channel set 1	EEG	11/07/2013
109	Longitudinal Sleep Study. AURA 400	EEG	11/07/2013
116	Gene Expression Analysis WG-6	Omics	01/07/2014
131	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Charlie Brown and Sesame Street - Project 1	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
132	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Animacy - Project 1	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
133	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Mom Stranger - Project 2	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
134	Jeste Lab UCLA ACEii: Face Emotion - Project 3	Eye Tracking	02/27/2014
145	AGRE/FMR1_Illumina.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
146	AGRE/MECP2_Sanger.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
147	AGRE/MECP2_Junior.JHU	Omics	04/14/2014
151	Candidate Gene Identification in familial Autism	Omics	06/09/2014
152	NJLAGS Whole Genome Sequencing	Omics	07/01/2014
154	Math Autism Study - Vinod Menon	fMRI	07/15/2014
155	Resting	fMRI	07/25/2014
156	Speech	fMRI	07/25/2014
159	Emotion	fMRI	07/25/2014
160	syllable contrast	EEG	07/29/2014
167	School-age naturalistic stimuli	Eye Tracking	09/19/2014
44	AGRE/Broad Affymetrix 5.0 Genotype Experiment	Omics	06/27/2011
45	Exome Sequencing of 20 Sporadic Cases of Autism Spectrum Disorder	Omics	07/15/2011

Collection - Add Experiment

Add Supporting Documentation

Funding Source:
URL:

Request Submission Exemption

Not Eligible

The Data Expected list for this Collection shows some raw data as missing. Contact the NDA Help Desk with any questions.

Please confirm that you will not be enrolling any more subjects and that all raw data has been collected and submitted.

Collection Updated

Your Collection is now in Data Analysis phase and exempt from biannual submissions. Analyzed data is still expected prior to publication or no later than the project end date.

[CMS] Error

[CMS]

Unable to change collection phase where targeted enrollment is less than 90%

You have requested to move the sharing dates for the following assessments:

Data Expected Item	Original Sharing Date	New Sharing Date

Please provide a reason for this change, which will be sent to the Program Officers listed within this collection:

Explanation must be between 20 and 200 characters in length.

Please press Save or Cancel

Intensive Intervention for Toddlers With Autism (EARLY STEPS) #16 Collection State:Shared

General
Experiments (0)
Shared Data
Publications (17)
Data Expected (32)
Associated Studies (12)

Collection Title	Collection Investigators	Collection Description
Collection Title:	Intensive Intervention for Toddlers With Autism (EARLY STEPS)
Collection Investigators:	Sally J. Rogers
Collection Description:	A Multi-Site Randomized Study of Intensive Treatment for Toddlers with Autism
Data Repository:	NIMH Data Archive
Permission Group:
Collection Creation Date:	01/22/2010
NIH Research Initiative:	Autism Centers of Excellence (ACE)
Collection Phase:	Funding Completed
Collection Sub-Phase:	Close Out
Collection State:	Shared
Blinded Clinical Trial:	Yes
Total Funded Amount:	$14,775,720.00
Subjects Shared:	98

{"values":[]}

{"values":[["Typical Control",5],["Sibling Control",5],["Neurological Control",12],["Autism Spectrum Mildly Affected",6],["Autism Spectrum Severely Affected",198],["Autism Spectrum Affected",53]]}

Loading Chart...

Funding Sources:

Funding Source Name	Funding Source URL
NIH - Extramural	None

Supporting Documentation:

Grant Information:

Project Number	Project Title	Start Date	End Date	Planned Enrollment	Actual Enrollment	Organization	Funds Obligated
R01MH081757-01	A Multi-Site Randomized Study of Intensive Treatment for Toddlers with Autism	09/20/2007	07/31/2013	0	97	UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS	$14,775,720.00

Clinical Trials:

Brief Summary	Status	Clinical Trial ID	Study ID	Principal Investigator	Start Date	End Date
Goals of the current project: (1) Does the Early Start Denver Model experimental intervention for toddlers with autism reduce disability associated with autism significantly more than standard community interventions?; and (2) What environmental, child, and biological characteristics mediate and moderate intervention response and outcomes at age 4?	Completed	NCT00698997	200816233	Sally J Rogers, Ph.D.	April 2008	December 2013

helpcenter.collection.general-tab

Collection - General Tab

Fields available for edit on the top portion of the page include:

Collection Title
Investigators
Collection Description
Collection Phase
Funding Source
Clinical Trials

Collection Status: The visibility status of an NDA Collection. Collection Status can be Shared or Private. Collections in Shared status are visible to all users and can be searched in the NDA Query Tool. Private Collections are not visible to NDA users. The Status of an NDA Collection only affects the visibility of information about the Collection (metadata) and does not relate to the status of the record-level research data in the NDA Collection.

Collection Phase: The current status of a research project submitting data to an NDA Collection, based on the timing of the award and/or the data that have been submitted.

Pre-Enrollment: The default entry made when the NDA Collection is created.
Enrolling: Data have been submitted to the NDA Collection or the NDA Data Expected initial submission date has been reached for at least one data structure category in the NDA Collection.
Data Analysis: Subject level data collection for the research project is completed and has been submitted to the NDA Collection. The NDA Collection owner or the NDA Help Desk may set this phase when they’ve confirmed data submission is complete and submitted subject counts match at least 90% of the target enrollment numbers in the NDA Data Expected. Data submission reminders will be turned off for the NDA Collection.
Funding Completed: The NIH grant award (or awards) associated with the NDA Collection has reached its end date. NDA Collections in Funding Completed phase are assigned a subphase to indicate the status of data submission.
- The Data Expected Subphase indicates that NDA expects more data will be submitted
- The Closeout Subphase indicates the data submission is complete.
- The Sharing Not Met Subphase indicates that data submission was not completed as expected.

Blinded Clinical Trial Status:

This status is set by a Collection Owner and indicates the research project is a double blinded clinical trial. When selected, the public view of Data Expected will show the Data Expected items and the Submission Dates, but the targeted enrollment and subjects submitted counts will not be displayed.
Targeted enrollment and subjects submitted counts are visible only to NDA Administrators and to the NDA Collection or as the NDA Collection Owner.
When an NDA Collection that is flagged Blinded Clinical Trial reaches the maximum data sharing date for that Data Repository (see https://nda.nih.gov/nda/sharing-regimen.html), the embargo on Data Expected information is released.

Funding Source

The organization(s) responsible for providing the funding is listed here.

Supporting Documentation

Users with Submission privileges, as well as Collection Owners, Program Officers, and those with Administrator privileges, may upload and attach supporting documentation. By default, supporting documentation is shared to the general public, however, the option is also available to limit this information to qualified researchers only.

Grant Information

Identifiable details are displayed about the Project of which the Collection was derived from. You may click in the Project Number to view a full report of the Project captured by the NIH.

Clinical Trials

Any data that is collected to support or further the research of clinical studies will be available here. Collection Owners and those with Administrator privileges may add new clinical trials.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) determine which Permission Group data are submitted into?

During Collection creation, NDA staff determine the appropriate Permission Group based on the type of data to be submitted, the type of access that will be available to data access users, and the information provided by the Program Officer during grant award.
How do I know when a NDA Collection has been created?

When a Collection is created by NDA staff and marked as Shared, an email notification will automatically be sent to the PI(s) of the grant(s) associated with the Collection to notify them.
Is a single grant number ever associated with more than one Collection?

The NDA system does not allow for a single grant to be associated with more than one Collection; therefore, a single grant will not be listed in the Grant Information section of a Collection for more than one Collection.
Why is there sometimes more than one grant included in a Collection?

In general, each Collection is associated with only one grant; however, multiple grants may be associated if the grant has multiple competing segments for the same grant number or if multiple different grants are all working on the same project and it makes sense to hold the data in one Collection (e.g., Cooperative Agreements).

Glossary

Administrator Privilege

A privilege provided to a user associated with an NDA Collection or NDA Study whereby that user can perform a full range of actions including providing privileges to other users.
Collection Owner

Generally, the Collection Owner is the contact PI listed on a grant. Only one NDA user is listed as the Collection owner. Most automated emails are primarily sent to the Collection Owner.
Collection Phase
The Collection Phase provides information on data submission as opposed to grant/project completion so while the Collection phase and grant/project phase may be closely related they are often different. Collection users with Administrative Privileges are encouraged to edit the Collection Phase. The Program Officer as listed in eRA (for NIH funded grants) may also edit this field. Changes must be saved by clicking the Save button at the bottom of the page. This field is sortable alphabetically in ascending or descending order. Collection Phase options include:
- Pre-Enrollment: A grant/project has started, but has not yet enrolled subjects.
- Enrolling: A grant/project has begun enrolling subjects. Data submission is likely ongoing at this point.
- Data Analysis: A grant/project has completed enrolling subjects and has completed all data submissions.
- Funding Completed: A grant/project has reached the project end date.
Collection State

The Collection State indicates whether the Collection is viewable and searchable. Collections can be either Private, Shared, or an Ongoing Study. A Collection that is shared does not necessarily have shared data as the Collection State and state of data are independent of each other. This field can be edited by Collection users with Administrative Privileges and the Program Officer as listed in eRA (for NIH funded grants). Changes must be saved by clicking the Save button at the bottom of the page.
Collection Title

An editable field with the title of the Collection, which is often the title of the grant associated with the Collection.
Grant

Provides the grant number(s) for the grant(s) associated with the Collection. The field is a hyperlink so clicking on the Grant number will direct the user to the grant information in the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) page.
Supporting Documentation

Various documents and materials to enable efficient use of the data by investigators unfamiliar with the project and may include the research protocol, questionnaires, and study manuals.
NIH Research Initiative

NDA Collections may be organized by scientific similarity into NIH Research Initiatives, to facilitate query tool user experience. NIH Research Initiatives map to one or multiple Funding Opportunity Announcements.
Permission Group

Access to shared record-level data in NDA is provisioned at the level of a Permission Group. NDA Permission Groups consist of one or multiple NDA Collections that contain data with the same subject consents.
Planned Enrollment

Number of human subject participants to be enrolled in an NIH-funded clinical research study. The data is provided in competing applications and annual progress reports.
Actual Enrollment

Number of human subjects enrolled in an NIH-funded clinical research study. The data is provided in annual progress reports.
NDA Collection

A virtual container and organization structure for data and associated documentation from one grant or one large project/consortium. It contains tools for tracking data submission and allows investigators to define a wide array of other elements that provide context for the data, including all general information regarding the data and source project, experimental parameters used to collect any event-based data contained in the Collection, methods, and other supporting documentation. They also allow investigators to link underlying data to an NDA Study, defining populations and subpopulations specific to research aims.
Data Use Limitations

Data Use Limitations (DULs) describe the appropriate secondary use of a dataset and are based on the original informed consent of a research participant. NDA only accepts consent-based data use limitations defined by the NIH Office of Science Policy.
Total Subjects Shared

The total number of unique subjects for whom data have been shared and are available for users with permission to access data.

Contact NDA Help Desk

ID	Name	Created Date	Status	Type
No records found.

helpcenter.collection.experiments-tab

Collection - Experiments

The number of Experiments included is displayed in parentheses next to the tab name. You may download all experiments associated with the Collection via the Download button. You may view individual experiments by clicking the Experiment Name and add them to the Filter Cart via the Add to Cart button.

Collection Owners, Program Officers, and users with Submission or Administrative Privileges for the Collection may create or edit an Experiment.

Please note: The creation of an NDA Experiment does not necessarily mean that data collected, according to the defined Experiment, has been submitted or shared.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an Experiment be associated with more than one Collection?
Yes -see the “Copy” button in the bottom left when viewing an experiment. There are two actions that can be performed via this button:
1. Copy the experiment with intent for modifications.
2. Associate the experiment to the collection. No modifications can be made to the experiment.

Glossary

Experiment Status

An Experiment must be Approved before data using the associated Experiment_ID may be uploaded.
Experiment ID

The ID number automatically generated by NDA which must be included in the appropriate file when uploading data to link the Experiment Definition to the subject record.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Shared Data

Data structures with the number of subjects submitted and shared are provided.

Shared Data:

Title	Type	Number of Subjects
Autism Diagnostic Interview, Rev (ADI-R) Toddler 2004	Clinical Assessments	57
Autism Diagnostic Interview, Rev (ADI-R) Toddler 2006	Clinical Assessments	57
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Toddler	Clinical Assessments	98
Battelle Developmental Inventory	Clinical Assessments	71
CHARGE Family Characteristics Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	93
CHARGE Medical History	Clinical Assessments	95
CHARGE Physical Exam	Clinical Assessments	94
CSBS DP Infant-Toddler Checklist	Clinical Assessments	91
Child Behavior Rating Scale	Clinical Assessments	94
Child Information Sheet	Clinical Assessments	96
DSM-IV Checklist (Early Steps; SOFAS)	Clinical Assessments	87
Dyadic Adjustment Scale	Clinical Assessments	86
Early Screening for Autistic Traits-ESAT	Clinical Assessments	31
Height and Weight	Clinical Assessments	89
Imitative Sequences	Clinical Assessments	97
Intervention History	Clinical Assessments	95
Joint Attention / Social and Nonsocial Orienting Task	Clinical Assessments	96
Life Events Survey	Clinical Assessments	88
M-CHAT	Clinical Assessments	69
MacArthur-Bates CDI - Words and Gestures Form	Clinical Assessments	88
Maternal Behavior Rating Scale (MBRS)	Clinical Assessments	94
Modified CHARGE Family Medical History (2007)	Clinical Assessments	94
Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT)	Clinical Assessments	69
Mullen Scales of Early Learning	Clinical Assessments	98
NCAST Teaching Scale	Clinical Assessments	49
Parent Satisfaction Rating	Clinical Assessments	26
Parent Sense of Competence	Clinical Assessments	89
Questionnaire on Resources and Stress	Clinical Assessments	89
Social Support Questionnaire	Clinical Assessments	89
Symptom Checklist-90-Revised	Clinical Assessments	75
Vineland-II - Parent and Caregiver Rating Form (2005)	Clinical Assessments	95
Working Alliance Scale	Clinical Assessments	80

helpcenter.collection.shared-data-tab

Collection - Shared Data

This tab provides a quick overview of the Data Structure title, Data Type, and Number of Subjects that are currently Shared for the Collection. The information presented in this tab is automatically generated by NDA and cannot be edited. If no information is visible on this tab, this would indicate the Collection does not have shared data or the data is private.

The shared data is available to other researchers who have permission to access data in the Collection's designated Permission Group(s). Use the Download button to get all shared data from the Collection to the Filter Cart.

Frequently Asked Questions

How will I know if another researcher uses data that I shared through the NIMH Data Archive (NDA)?

To see what data your project have submitted are being used by a study, simply go the Associated Studies tab of your collection. Alternatively, you may review an NDA Study Attribution Report available on the General tab.
Can I get a supplement to share data from a completed research project?

Often it becomes more difficult to organize and format data electronically after the project has been completed and the information needed to create a GUID may not be available; however, you may still contact a program staff member at the appropriate funding institution for more information.
Can I get a supplement to share data from a research project that is still ongoing?

Unlike completed projects where researchers may not have the information needed to create a GUID and/or where the effort needed to organize and format data becomes prohibitive, ongoing projects have more of an opportunity to overcome these challenges. Please contact a program staff member at the appropriate funding institution for more information.

Glossary

Data Structure

A defined organization and group of Data Elements to represent an electronic definition of a measure, assessment, questionnaire, or collection of data points. Data structures that have been defined in the NDA Data Dictionary are available at https://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=data-structure
Data Type

A grouping of data by similar characteristics such as Clinical Assessments, Omics, or Neurosignal data.
Shared

The term 'Shared' generally means available to others; however, there are some slightly different meanings based on what is Shared. A Shared NDA Collection or NDA Study is viewable and searchable publicly regardless of the user's role or whether the user has an NDA account. A Shared Collection or NDA Study does not necessarily mean that data submitted to the Collection or used in the NDA Study have been shared as this is independently determined. Data are shared according the schedule defined in a Collection's Data Expected Tab and/or in accordance with data sharing expectations in the NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Additionally, Supporting Documentation uploaded to a Collection may be shared independent of whether data are shared, but will only be viewable and accessible if the Collection is Shared.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Publications

Publications relevant to NDA data are listed below. Most displayed publications have been associated with the grant within Pubmed. Use the "+ New Publication" button to add new publications. Publications relevant/not relevant to data expected are categorized. Relevant publications are then linked to the underlying data by selecting the Create Study link. Study provides the ability to define cohorts, assign subjects, define outcome measures and lists the study type, data analysis and results. Analyzed data and results are expected in this way.

PubMed ID	Study	Title	Journal	Authors	Date	Status
32731748	Create Study	Identifying and measuring the common elements of naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for autism spectrum disorder: Development of the NDBI-Fi.	Autism : the international journal of research and practice	Frost, Kyle M; Brian, Jessica; Gengoux, Grace W; Hardan, Antonio; Rieth, Sarah R; Stahmer, Aubyn; Ingersoll, Brooke	November 1, 2020	Not Determined
31925669	Create Study	Quantifying Caregiver Change Across Early Autism Interventions Using the Measure of NDBI Strategy Implementation: Caregiver Change (MONSI-CC).	Journal of autism and developmental disorders	Vibert, Bethany A; Dufek, Sarah; Klein, Claire B; Choi, Yeo Bi; Winter, Jamie; Lord, Catherine; Kim, So Hyun	April 2020	Not Determined
30768394	Create Study	A Multisite Randomized Controlled Two-Phase Trial of the Early Start Denver Model Compared to Treatment as Usual.	Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry	Rogers, Sally J; Estes, Annette; Lord, Catherine; Munson, Jeff; Rocha, Marie; Winter, Jamie; Greenson, Jessica; Colombi, Costanza; Dawson, Geraldine; Vismara, Laurie A; Sugar, Catherine A; Hellemann, Gerhard; Whelan, Fiona; Talbott, Meagan	September 2019	Not Determined
30623667	Create Study	A novel method for measuring learning opportunities provided by parents to young children with autism spectrum disorder.	Autism : the international journal of research and practice	Davlantis KS, Estes A, Dawson G, Rogers SJ	August 2019	Not Determined
30303398	Create Study	Measuring treatment response in children with autism spectrum disorder: Applications of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change to the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule.	Autism : the international journal of research and practice	Kim, So Hyun; Grzadzinski, Rebecca; Martinez, Kassandra; Lord, Catherine	July 2019	Not Determined
29237275	Create Study	An exploratory longitudinal study of social and language outcomes in children with autism in bilingual home environments.	Autism : the international journal of research and practice	Zhou, Vanessa; Munson, Jeffrey A; Greenson, Jessica; Hou, Yan; Rogers, Sally; Estes, Annette M	February 2019	Not Determined
27062034	Create Study	Measuring Changes in Social Communication Behaviors: Preliminary Development of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC).	Journal of autism and developmental disorders	Grzadzinski, Rebecca; Carr, Themba; Colombi, Costanza; McGuire, Kelly; Dufek, Sarah; Pickles, Andrew; Lord, Catherine	July 2016	Not Determined
26088663	Create Study	Long-Term Outcomes of Early Intervention in 6-Year-Old Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.	Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry	Estes, Annette; Munson, Jeffrey; Rogers, Sally J; Greenson, Jessica; Winter, Jamie; Dawson, Geraldine	July 2015	Not Relevant
23911756	Create Study	Antihypertensive drugs decrease risk of Alzheimer disease: Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory Study.	Neurology	Yasar, Sevil; Xia, Jin; Yao, Wenliang; Furberg, Curt D; Xue, Qian-Li; Mercado, Carla I; Fitzpatrick, Annette L; Fried, Linda P; Kawas, Claudia H; Sink, Kaycee M; Williamson, Jeff D; DeKosky, Steven T; Carlson, Michelle C; Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory (GEM) Study Investigators	September 3, 2013	Not Relevant
23838727	Create Study	The impact of parent-delivered intervention on parents of very young children with autism.	Journal of autism and developmental disorders	Estes, Annette; Vismara, Laurie; Mercado, Carla; Fitzpatrick, Annette; Elder, Lauren; Greenson, Jessica; Lord, Catherine; Munson, Jeffrey; Winter, Jamie; Young, Gregory; Dawson, Geraldine; Rogers, Sally	February 2014	Not Determined
23153932	Create Study	Diagnosing autism in neurobiological research studies.	Behavioural brain research	Jones, Rebecca M; Lord, Catherine	August 15, 2013	Not Relevant
23021480	Create Study	Effects of a brief Early Start Denver model (ESDM)-based parent intervention on toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders: a randomized controlled trial.	Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry	Rogers, Sally J; Estes, Annette; Lord, Catherine; Vismara, Laurie; Winter, Jamie; Fitzpatrick, Annette; Guo, Mengye; Dawson, Geraldine	October 2012	Not Determined
22486486	Create Study	Annual research review: re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders.	Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines	Lord C, Jones RM	May 2012	Not Relevant
21058793	Create Study	Autism: from research to practice.	The American psychologist	Lord, Catherine E	November 2010	Not Relevant
20890377	Create Study	[What are infant siblings teaching us about autism in infancy?]	Enfance; psychologie, pedagogie, neuropsychiatrie, sociologie	Rogers, Sally J	January 2009	Not Relevant
20868374	Create Study	Intervening in infancy: implications for autism spectrum disorders.	Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines	Wallace, Katherine S; Rogers, Sally J	December 2010	Not Relevant
19582867	Create Study	What are infant siblings teaching us about autism in infancy?	Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research	Rogers, Sally J	June 2009	Not Relevant

helpcenter.collection.publications-tab

Collection - Publications

The number of Publications is displayed in parentheses next to the tab name. Clicking on any of the Publication Titles will open the Publication in a new internet browsing tab.

Collection Owners, Program Officers, and users with Submission or Administrative Privileges for the Collection may mark a publication as either Relevant or Not Relevant in the Status column.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I determine if a publication is relevant?

Publications are considered relevant to a collection when the data shared is directly related to the project or collection.
Where does the NDA get the publications?

PubMed, an online library containing journals, articles, and medical research. Sponsored by NiH and National Library of Medicine (NLM).

Glossary

Create Study

A link to the Create an NDA Study page that can be clicked to start creating an NDA Study with information such as the title, journal and authors automatically populated.
Not Determined Publication

Indicates that the publication has not yet been reviewed and/or marked as Relevant or Not Relevant so it has not been determined whether an NDA Study is expected.
Not Relevant Publication

A publication that is not based on data related to the aims of the grant/project associated with the Collection or not based on any data such as a review article and, therefore, an NDA Study is not expected to be created.
PubMed

PubMed provides citation information for biomedical and life sciences publications and is managed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine.
PubMed ID

The PUBMed ID is the unique ID number for the publication as recorded in the PubMed database.
Relevant Publication

A publication that is based on data related to the aims of the grant/project associated with the Collection and, therefore, an NDA Study is expected to be created.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Data Expected List: Mandatory Data Structures

These data structures are mandatory for your NDA Collection. Please update the Targeted Enrollment number to accurately represent the number of subjects you expect to submit for the entire study.

Data Expected	Targeted Enrollment	Initial Submission	Subjects Submitted	Initial Share	Subjects Shared	Status
Research Subject and Pedigree	98	01/15/2009	0	05/15/2009	0	Approved

You can use "Add New Data Expected" to add exsiting structures and create your project's list. However, this is also the method you can use to request new structures be created for your project. When adding the Data Expected item, if the structure already exists you can locate it and specify your dates and enrollment. To add a new structure and request it be defined in the Data Dictionary, select Upload Definition and attach the definition or material needed to create it, including manual, codebooks, forms, etc. If you have multiple files, please upload a zipped archive containing them all.

Expected dates should be selected based on the standard Data Sharing Regimen and are restricted to within date ranges based on the project start and end dates.

Data Expected List: Data Structures per Research Aims

These data structures are specific to your research aims and should list all data structures in which data will be collected and submitted for this NDA Collection. Please update the Targeted Enrollment number to accurately represent the number of subjects you expect to submit for the entire study.

Data Expected	Targeted Enrollment	Initial Submission	Subjects Submitted	Initial Share	Subjects Shared	Status
Mullen Scales of Early Learning	97	01/15/2009	98	05/15/2009	98	Approved
ADOS	98	01/15/2009	98	05/15/2009	98	Approved
Life Events Checklist	98	01/15/2009	88	05/15/2009	88	Approved
Working Alliance Scale	98	01/15/2009	80	05/15/2009	80	Approved
Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOCS)	98	01/15/2009	89	05/15/2009	89	Approved
ADI-R	125	01/15/2009	98	05/15/2009	98	Approved
Dyadic Adjustment Scale	98	01/15/2009	86	05/15/2009	86	Approved
PDD Behavior Inventory (PDDBI)	98	07/15/2013	0	11/15/2013	0	Approved
Medical History	98	01/15/2009	95	05/15/2009	95	Approved
Maternal Behavior Rating Scale (MBRS)	94	01/15/2009	94	05/15/2009	94	Approved
NCAST	98	01/15/2009	49	05/15/2009	49	Approved
Early Screening of Autistic Traits Questionnaire (ESAT)	98	01/15/2009	31	05/15/2009	31	Approved
Demographics	98	01/15/2009	96	05/15/2009	96	Approved
M-CHAT	98	01/15/2009	69	05/15/2009	69	Approved
Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales (CSBS)	98	01/15/2009	91	05/15/2009	91	Approved
Questionnaire on Resources and Stress (QRS-F)	98	01/15/2009	89	05/15/2009	89	Approved
Joint Attention Task	98	01/15/2009	96	05/15/2009	96	Approved
DAS-II: Differential Ability Scales	98	07/15/2013	0	11/15/2013	0	Approved
MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventory	98	01/15/2009	88	05/15/2009	88	Approved
Parent Satisfaction Rating	98	01/15/2009	26	05/15/2009	26	Approved
Social Support Questionnaire	98	01/15/2009	89	05/15/2009	89	Approved
Intervention History	98	01/15/2009	95	05/15/2009	95	Approved
Language Use Inventory (LUI)	98	07/15/2013	0	11/15/2013	0	Approved
DSM IV Criteria	98	01/15/2009	87	05/15/2009	87	Approved
Child Behavior Rating Scale (CBRS)	98	01/15/2009	94	05/15/2009	94	Approved
Battelle Developmental Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-2)	98	01/15/2009	71	05/15/2009	71	Approved
Symptom Checklist-90-Revised	98	01/15/2009	75	05/15/2009	75	Approved
Preschool Language Scale (PLS)	98	07/15/2013	0	11/15/2013	0	Approved
Physical Exam	98	01/15/2009	97	05/15/2009	97	Approved
Imitative Sequences	98	01/15/2009	97	05/15/2009	97	Approved
Vineland (Parent and Caregiver)	98	01/15/2009	95	05/15/2009	95	Approved

Structure not yet defined

No Status history for this Data Expected has been recorded yet

helpcenter.collection.data-expected-tab

Collection - Data Expected

The Data Expected tab displays the list of all data that NDA expects to receive in association with the Collection as defined by the contributing researcher, as well as the dates for the expected initial upload of the data, and when it is first expected to be shared, or with the research community. Above the primary table of Data Expected, any publications determined to be relevant to the data within the Collection are also displayed - members of the contributing research group can use these to define NDA Studies, connecting those papers to underlying data in NDA.

The tab is used both as a reference for those accessing shared data, providing information on what is expected and when it will be shared, and as the primary tracking mechanism for contributing projects. It is used by both contributing primary researchers, secondary researchers, and NIH Program and Grants Management staff.

Contributing researchers just getting started on their project will need to define this list by adding all of the items they are collecting under their grant and setting their schedule according to the NDA Data Sharing Regimen. If you fall into this category, you can begin by clicking "Add New Data Expected" and selecting which data structures you will be using, saving the page after each change, or requesting new structures by adding and naming a new item, providing any materials NDA Data Dictionary Curators can use to help define your structure. For more information see the tutorial on creating Data Expected.

If you are a contributing researcher creating this list for the first time, or making changes to the list as your project progress, please note the following:

Although items you add to the list and changes you make are displayed, they are not committed to the system until you Save the entire page using the "Save" button at the bottom of your screen. Please Save after every change to ensure none of your work is lost.
If you attempt to add a new structure, the title you provide must be unique - if another structure exists with the same name your change will fail.
Adding a new structure to this list is the only way to request the creation of a new Data Dictionary definition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an NDA Data Structure?

An NDA Data Structure is comprised of multiple Data Elements to make up an electronic definition of an assessment, measure, questionnaire, etc will have a corresponding Data Structure.
What is the NDA Data Dictionary?

The NDA Data Dictionary is comprised of electronic definitions known as Data Structures.

Glossary

Analyzed Data

Data specific to the primary aims of the research being conducted (e.g. outcome measures, other dependent variables, observations, laboratory results, analyzed images, volumetric data, etc.) including processed images.
Data Item

Items listed on the Data Expected list in the Collection which may be an individual and discrete Data Structure, Data Structure Category, or Data Structure Group.
Data Structure

A defined organization and group of Data Elements to represent an electronic definition of a measure, assessment, questionnaire, or collection of data points. Data structures that have been defined in the NDA Data Dictionary are available at https://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=data-structure
Data Structure Category

An NDA term describing the affiliation of a Data Structure to a Category, which may be disease/disorder or diagnosis related (Depression, ADHD, Psychosis), specific to data type (MRI, eye tracking, omics), or type of data (physical exam, IQ).
Data Structure Group

A Data Item listed on the Data Expected tab of a Collection that indicates a group of Data Structures (e.g., ADOS or SCID) for which data may be submitted instead of a specific Data Structure identified by version, module, edition, etc. For example, the ADOS Data Structure Category includes every ADOS Data Structure such as ADOS Module 1, ADOS Module 2, ADOS Module 1 - 2nd Edition, etc. The SCID Data Structure Group includes every SCID Data Structure such as SCID Mania, SCID V Mania, SCID PTSD, SCID-V Diagnosis, and more.
Evaluated Data

A new Data Structure category, Evaluated Data is analyzed data resulting from the use of computational pipelines in the Cloud and can be uploaded directly back to a miNDAR database. Evaluated Data is expected to be listed as a Data Item in the Collection's Data Expected Tab.
Imaging Data

Imaging+ is an NDA term which encompasses all imaging related data including, but not limited to, images (DTI, MRI, PET, Structural, Spectroscopy, etc.) as well as neurosignal data (EEG, fMRI, MEG, EGG, eye tracking, etc.) and Evaluated Data.
Initial Share Date

Initial Submission and Initial Share dates should be populated according to the NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Any modifications to these will go through the approval processes outlined above. Data will be shared with authorized users upon publication (via an NDA Study) or 1-2 years after the grant end date specified on the first Notice of Award, as defined in the applicable Data Sharing Terms and Conditions.
Initial Submission Date

Initial Submission and Initial Share dates should be populated according to these NDA Data Sharing Terms and Conditions. Any modifications to these will go through the approval processes outlined above. Data for all subjects is not expected on the Initial Submission Date and modifications may be made as necessary based on the project's conduct.
Research Subject and Pedigree

An NDA created Data Structure used to convey basic information about the subject such as demographics, pedigree (links family GUIDs), diagnosis/phenotype, and sample location that are critical to allow for easier querying of shared data.
Submission Cycle

The NDA has two Submission Cycles per year - January 15 and July 15.
Submission Exemption

An interface to notify NDA that data may not be submitted during the upcoming/current submission cycle.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Collection Owners and those with Collection Administrator permission, may edit a collection. The following is currently available for Edit on this page:

Associated Studies

Studies that have been defined using data from a Collection are important criteria to determine the value of data shared. The number of subjects column displays the counts from this Collection that are included in a Study, out of the total number of subjects in that study. The Data Use column represents whether or not the study is a primary analysis of the data or a secondary analysis. State indicates whether the study is private or shared with the research community.

Study NameFilter by Study Name	AbstractFilter by Abstract	Collection/Study SubjectsFilter by Collection/Study Subjects	Data UsageFilter by Data Usage	StateFilter by State
Examining the validity of the use of ratio IQs in psychological assessments	IQ tests are amongst the most used psychological assessments, both in research and clinical settings. For participants who cannot complete IQ tests normed for their age, ratio IQ scores (RIQ) are routinely computed and used as a proxy of IQ, especially in large research databases to avoid missing data points. However, because it has never been scientifically validated, this practice is questionable. In the era of big data, it is important to examine the validity of this widely used practice. In this paper, we use the case of autism to examine the differences between standard full-scale IQ (FSIQ) and RIQ. Data was extracted from four databases in which ages, FSIQ scores and subtests raw scores were available for autistic participants between 2 and 17 years old. The IQ tests included were the MSEL (N=12033), DAS-II early years (N=1270), DAS-II school age (N=2848), WISC-IV (N=471) and WISC-V (N=129). RIQs were computed for each participant as well as the discrepancy (DSC) between RIQ and FSIQ. We performed two linear regressions to respectively assess the effect of FSIQ and of age on the DSC for each IQ test, followed by additional analyses comparing age subgroups as well as FSIQ subgroups on DSC. Participants at the extremes of the FSIQ distribution tended to have a greater DSC than participants with average FSIQ. Furthermore, age significantly predicted the DSC, with RIQ superior to FSIQ for younger participants while the opposite was found for older participants. These results question the validity of this widely used alternative scoring method, especially for individuals at the extremes of the normal distribution, with whom RIQs are most often employed.	98/17423	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Controls for SCCRIP	To establish a well characterized cohort for pediatric patients living with sickle cell disease	5/11185	Secondary Analysis	Private
The importance of low IQ to early diagnosis of autism	Some individuals can flexibly adapt to life’s changing demands while others, in particular those with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), find it challenging. The origin of early individual differences in cognitive abilities, the putative tools with which to navigate novel information in life, including in infants later diagnosed with ASD remains unexplored. Moreover, the role of intelligence quotient (IQ) vis-à-vis core features of autism remains debated. We systematically investigate the contribution of early IQ in future autism outcomes in an extremely large, population-based study of 8,000 newborns, infants, and toddlers from the US between 2 and 68 months with over 15,000 cross-sectional and longitudinal assessments, and for whom autism outcomes are ascertained or ruled out by about 2-4 years. This population is representative of subjects involved in the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded research, mainly on atypical development, in the US. Analyses using predetermined age bins showed that IQ scores are consistently lower in ASD relative to TD at all ages (p<0.001), and IQ significantly correlates with calibrated severity scores (total CSS, as well as non-verbal and verbal CSS) on the ADOS. Note, VIQ is no better than the full-scale IQ to predict ASD cases. These findings raise new, compelling questions about potential atypical brain circuitry affecting performance in both verbal and nonverbal abilities and that precede an ASD diagnosis. This study is the first to establish prospectively that low early IQ is a major feature of ASD in early childhood.	98/6323	Secondary Analysis	Shared
The effect of compensatory mechanisms during and after pregnancy on a child's development	Early childhood involves rapid processes of human growth leading to different trajectories in physical, cognitive, social, and emotional development (Graignic-Philippe et al., 2014). These processes are influenced by a wide variety of factors such as maternal health, environmental stressors, and early childhood experiences. Current literature has shown how exposure to both acute and chronic stress during pregnancy have a pathogenetic effect throughout childhood (Kim & Leventhal, 2015; Rice, et al, 2010), leading to neurotypical or atypical development. Studies have shown how these stressors are linked neurodevelopmental disorders such Autism Spectrum Disorders (Zerbo et al., 2015; Atladóttir et al., 2012) or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (Rosenqvist et al., 2019). In recent years, there has been a shift from traditional diagnostic research models to synthesis of different scientific fields to map lifecourse development in order for rapid translation into healthcare practices (Halfon et al., 2014). Whilst there are studies showing links between stress and atypical developmental outcomes, there is still very limited literature on compensatory mechanisms found pre- and post-pregnancy, which illustrate development of protective factors (such as presence of self-regulation, high verbal intelligence, sociability, adept social communication) against atypical developmental outcomes. This study aims to identify and measure the presence of these protective factors that appear to guard against or mitigate the emergence of neurodevelopmental disorders. Therefore, nationwide and longitudinal data are needed in order to accurately create risk models in order to map developmental trajectories.	1/5717	Secondary Analysis	Private
Autism Sensory Research Consortium Cross-lab Integrative Data Analysis	Since 2013, when sensory features were officially added to the diagnostic criteria for autism, research into the sensory manifestations of the condition has increased dramatically. However, the majority of this research has primarily been conducted using small laboratory-based samples of children on the autism spectrum, substantially limiting the hypotheses that can be tested in any one dataset and the generalizability of results to the wider autistic population. The Autism Sensory Research Consortium (ASRC), funded by the Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation, represents the first major international collaboration of over a dozen research groups that study sensory functioning in autism. As a major thrust of this collaboration, the ASRC has begun a data sharing initiative, in which all participating labs can contribute existing data from their past and present research studies to a centralized database. These “Big Data” can then be systematically examined using powerful large-sample statistical techniques such as structural equation modeling and item response theory, which will allow researchers to test more complex hypotheses regarding the nature of sensory differences in autism and their relationships with sociodemographic and non-sensory clinical features. Once data from all sites has been pooled, it will be analyzed using a method called integrative data analysis, which is specially designed to derive insights from large and heterogeneous samples. One major advantage of this methodology is the ability to construct and test measurement models of sensory symptoms, determining the most appropriate set of questions for assessing each construct and making sure that the scales do not produce biased comparisons when they are examined across diagnostic groups or subsets of the autistic population. Furthermore, measurement models can be constructed to bridge multiple questionnaires, allowing for the calculation of robust composite scores that can be compared between studies that only administered items from one of the contributing questionnaires. These models can further facilitate pooling of data across studies, allowing us to amass even larger datasets to answer questions about sensory function in the autistic population. Furthermore, moving forward, the composite sensory measures from the integrative data analysis can be employed in other studies, providing investigators in sensory autism research with a suite of reliable and valid behavioral measures that can be used as outcomes in trials of interventions targeting these symptoms. In the long term, this project has the potential to help us better understand the nature of sensory function in persons on the spectrum, as well as how sensory alterations relate to broader features of the condition—specifically, for whom and/or at what point in development sensory features are most predictive of core autism behaviors or other meaningful clinical outcomes such as language acquisition and adaptive behavior. Incorporation of neuroscientific data collected within the ASRC can also possibly shed some light on the neural basis of sensory disruptions in the autistic population. All of this will help to lay a foundation for future work testing the efficacy of candidate interventions aimed at improving sensory function and more distal skills in autistic individuals.	7/2110	Secondary Analysis	Private
Personalized Autism Symptom Assessment with the Youth Top Problems Scale: Observational and Parent-Report Formats for Clinical Trials Applications	To date, few measures of comorbid psychiatric symptoms in the context of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been established as both psychometrically robust and sensitive to the effects of treatment. Therefore, I propose to conduct an item response theory (IRT) analysis for this study using the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI) data from the National Database for Autism Research. Item parameters will be obtained through an IRT calibration of CASI items using flexMIRT.3 (Cai, 2016). In order to conduct IRT, the CASI calibration sample will include both these NDAR participants and a sample of 68 children with diagnoses of ASD and IQ>70 (ages 6-13 years) who participated in our recent NIMH-funded clinical trial of cognitive behavioral therapy, which will create a sample large enough for the IRT analysis. I plan to publish this data as part of a broader psychometric study of children with autism.	2/746	Secondary Analysis	Private
Word Learning and Word Features	Vocabulary composition and word-learning biases are closely interrelated in typical development. Learning new words involves attending to certain properties to facilitate word learning. Such word-learning biases are influenced by perceptually and conceptually salient word features, including high imageability, concreteness, and iconicity. This study examined the association of vocabulary knowledge and word features in young children with ASD (n = 280) and typically developing (TD) toddlers (n = 1,054). Secondary analyses were conducted using data from the National Database for Autism Research and the Wordbank database. Expressive vocabulary was measured using the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory. Although the trajectories for concreteness, iconicity, and imageability are similar between children with ASD and TD toddlers, divergences were observed. Differences in imageability are seen early but resolve to a common trajectory; differences in iconicity are small but consistent; and differences in concreteness only emerge after both groups reach a simultaneous peak, before converging again. This study reports unique information about the nonlinear growth patterns associated with each word feature for and distinctions in these growth patterns between the groups.	1/280	Primary Analysis	Shared
Examining the Shape Bias in Young Autistic Children: A Vocabulary Composition Analysis	Shape is a salient object property and one of the first that children use to categorize objects under one label. Colunga and Sims (2017) suggest that noun vocabulary composition and word learning biases are closely interrelated in typical development. The current study examined the association between noun vocabulary knowledge and perceptual word features, specifically shape and material features. Participants included 249 autistic children and 1,245 non-autistic toddlers who were matched on expressive noun vocabulary size and gender. Nouns were categorized using the Samuelson and Smith (1999) noun feature database. A simple group comparison revealed no group differences in shape bias; both groups evidenced developing noun vocabularies that favored shape+solid and nonsolid+material nouns. However, the trajectory of evidence of shape bias as a function of vocabulary size differed between the groups, with autistic children demonstrating a reduced shape-bias initially. Future work should examine how children’s learning biases shift over development and whether the shape bias promotes lexical development to the same degree across groups.	1/249	Secondary Analysis	Private
Deviant vocabulary development in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder	Children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have core impairments in social communication and have restricted interests and repetitive behaviors. Additionally, the majority of young children with ASD have early language delays. Although these early delays are well-documented, it is remains unclear whether language skills are simply delayed or if they are deviant. The current study aimed to expand on previous studies (e.g., Charman et al., 2003; Luyster, Lopez, & Lord, 2007; Rescorla & Safyer, 2012) to provide a large-scale comparison of early language profiles between typically developing (TD) toddlers and young children with ASD. Specifically, we sought to examine the composition of word classes (i.e., nouns, predicates, and close classed words) and semantic categories (i.e., games and routines, sound effects and animal noises) in the early TD and ASD language profiles. A series of linear regression analyses revealed that children with ASD produced a smaller percentage of nouns, and that the percentage of nouns in a vocabulary decreased as children learned more words, but that this reduction was less steep in the ASD group. When examining predicates, we found that children with ASD produced a significantly higher percentage of predicates. Also, as vocabulary size increased, the percentage of predicates increased; however, the slope was less steep for children with ASD. Lastly, children with SD produced a significantly higher percentage of closed class words and the trajectory of growth of the percentage of closed class words differed between groups. The current findings suggest that children with ASD may employ different word-learning strategies during early lexical development.	1/247	Secondary Analysis	Shared
EVIDENCE FOR THE DIMENSIONAL AND CATEGORIAL ACCOUNTS OF LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT	This study compared the lexical composition of 216 children with ASD aged 11 to 173 months with that of 7,287 typically developing toddlers with and without language delay aged 8 to 30 months. The children with ASD and late talkers produced a lower proportion of nouns and a higher proportion of predicates than typical talkers. The ASD group produced a higher proportion of action words and place words as well as a lower proportion of sound words than the neurotypical groups. We found that children with ASD produced fewer high-social verbs as rated by adults. We discuss how these differences might be associated with features of ASD in a way that supports the categorical view of language development.	1/216	Secondary Analysis	Shared
Semantic modeling 2023	Although it is well documented that children with ASD are slower to develop their lexicons, we still have a limited understanding of the structure of early lexical knowledge in children with ASD. The current study uses network analysis and differential item functioning anlaysis to examine the structure of semantic knowledge, which may provide insight into the learning processes that influence early word learning.	1/208	Secondary Analysis	Private
Semantic Network Modeling	Although it is well documented that children with ASD are slower to develop their lexicons, we still have a limited understanding of the structure of early lexical knowledge in children with ASD. The current study uses network analysis to examine the structure of semantic knowledge, which may provide insight into the learning processes that influence early word learning.	1/200	Secondary Analysis	Shared

* Data not on individual level

helpcenter.collection.associated-studies-tab

Collection - Associated Studies

Clicking on the Study Title will open the study details in a new internet browser tab. The Abstract is available for viewing, providing the background explanation of the study, as provided by the Collection Owner.

Primary v. Secondary Analysis: The Data Usage column will have one of these two choices. An associated study that is listed as being used for Primary Analysis indicates at least some and potentially all of the data used was originally collected by the creator of the NDA Study. Secondary Analysis indicates the Study owner was not involved in the collection of data, and may be used as supporting data.

Private v. Shared State: Studies that remain private indicate the associated study is only available to users who are able to access the collection. A shared study is accessible to the general public.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I associate a study to my collection?

Studies are associated to the Collection automatically when the data is defined in the Study.

Glossary

Associated Studies Tab

A tab in a Collection that lists the NDA Studies that have been created using data from that Collection including both Primary and Secondary Analysis NDA Studies.

Contact NDA Help Desk

Edit

Description
Value Range
Notes
Data Structures with shared data

Choose File:	Select File
File Type:
Description:

Exemption Type*
From Date*
To Date*
Reason*	Characters Remaining:

Disclaimer

NDA Help Center

Filter Cart

Frequently Asked Questions

Glossary